Hello Steven, and thanks for your message,
> I have also experienced this issue. I was able to work around it by editing > the PNG file. > > If you open your PNG file in an editor (I used The GIMP) and click on the > area that is supposed to be transparent with the color-picker tool, you'll > probably see that the RGB color values are: > > R: 0 > G: 0 > B: 0 > Alpha: 0 > > In order for regions to appear transparent in nano-X you need to change the > RGB values for the transparent area to: > > R: 255 > G: 255 > B: 255 > Alpha: 0 I done some tests and I noticed some funny results : First time I used the 0.91 : With the "0.91" version I noticed that PNG image with RGB=0,0,0 and Alpha=0 for transparent color was display in black (not transparent) but PNG image with RGB=255,255,255 and Alpha=0 (or no alpha) for transparent color was diplay with ritght transparent at this part. After I download nano-X sources from the CVS repository Version "pre 0.92" and I noticed that there's a different comportment : An image PNG with RGB=0,0,0 (or RGB=255,255,255) and Alpha=0 for transparent color was right display, but normaly an image with RGB=255,255,255 and no Alpha was display in white for parts (and not with transparent colors). Maybe there's several difference between the 0.91 and the "pre 0.92"... Anyway I work now with the last CVS version (pre 0.92), but this difference is strange. Maybe a fixed bug ? Any colors informations was took with gimp· > (In fact, I think any region in a PNG that has a RGB value of (255,255,255) > will appear transparent, even if the alpha value isn't 0.) Right ! It's that what I noticed for the 0.91 version (but not with pre 0.92). With this last version alpha seems to be set. > I am not experienced with photo editors, and I had to try several of them > before I found one where I could figure out how to modify the RGB values of > the transparent region. Without going step-by-step, I was able to do this in > The GIMP by selecting the transparent region by color, replacing its color > with pure white (255,255,255), and then making the region clear again. > > I'm not super experienced with nano-X so maybe someone else out there has a > simpler way to fix this problem. But I hope this is helpful anyway. Thanks again, > Steven Vahl Regards, Vincent BRACH
