> This is ofcourse the best solution for the issue Jeroen brought up, but
that
> other users might still expect the possibility to use relational
operations
> on versions. Meaning: should the following functions return a version
data
> type :
>
> assembly::get-version(string)
> file::get-file-version(string)
> file::get-product-version(string)
>
> and we could then have the following functions in the version namespace :
>
> version::get-major(version)
> version::get-minor(version)
> version::get-build(version)
> version::get-revision(version)
> version::to-string(version)
> version::parse(string) or version::from-string(string)
>
> and support the same operators as supported by the System.Version.
Imagine this extension to NAnt function calls:
assembly::get-version('aaaa.dll')::major
assembly::get-version('aaaa.dll')::minor
assembly::get-version('aaaa.dll')::build
assembly::get-version('aaaa.dll')::revision
('.' as a member access operator cannot be used because it can be a part of
a valid identifier)
Same thing would work for functions that return datetime, timespan and other
structures.
datetime::now()::seconds
timespan::whatever()::totalseconds
In the future when we support typed properties, you'd be allowed to do it
even on properties:
<property name="zzz" type="datetime" value="${datetime::now()}" />
<echo message="${zzz::seconds}" />
What do you think?
Jarek
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
