The version task sounds like something that should be included in the core set of tasks. It also sounds like a good replacement for the current script.
Does it work on the AssemblyInfo.cs file, if so, does it work for vb.net and jscript.net also? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-developers- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith, Eric V. > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 5:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [nant-dev] Version task > > I have created a task (VersionTask) that reads the AssemblyVersion > attribute from the AssemblyInfo.cs file. It handles all of the valid > version number formats: > 1 > 1.2 > 1.2.* > 1.2.3 > 1.2.3.* > 1.2.3.4 > > It can set a nant property (Project.Properties) to any prefix of this > version number, that is it can set the property to "1", "1.2", "1.2.3", > or "1.2.3.4". Therefore it can replace the script task in NAnt.build > which reads the version number. > > It can also optionally increment any portion of the version number > (major.minor.build.revision). I use it to increment the revision number > every time I build, and increment the build number on nightly builds. > > It's set up as a base class, a utilty class, the VersionTask class > itself, and a BuildnumTask that I use to manage version numbers in c++ > .h files. It's in 4 files because that's the coding convention > specified on > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6080&group_id=31650. > I doubt anyone else will find the BuildNum task very useful, but I could > probably generalize it to make it better. > > So, here's my question. Assuming other people find this task useful, > should I include it in nant? If so, where? I've currently got it set > up to load dynamically by putting it in a VersionTasks.dll file which I > move into the bin directory after a build. I'd just as soon leave it > like that, but it makes sense to me to change NAnt.build to use > VersionTask. If so, it seems that it should go into the nant core. If > I do that, I probably won't put my BuildnumTask into the core, I'll > leave that as a dynamically loaded task. But I will need to put the > base class and the utility class into the core. If it's not thought to > be generally useful I'll put it under Extras. > > Any thoughts? > > Eric. > > _______________________________________________ > Nant-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
