Tomas: (re: NantContrib:) >I'm not sure if it's worh it to keep them separated >anymore.
>Any thoughts? While I understood the reasons behind the separation, I have felt for a while that they should be recombined, if not for technical reasons (like versioning) then for end-user clarity: 1) having to understand to distros and how they relate increases the learning (and thus the adoption curve) for new users. 2) managing two tools that work so closely together is going to cause some to shy away due to the increased maintenance. 3) Knowing whether a given task is in NantContrib, or the Core distro is one extra item to document and research 4) The NantContrib project isn't going anywhere. The last one might yet resolve itself, but its possible that it is a matter of marketing -- OSS projects get traffic based on many factors, however many people hear of Nant, only some percentage are going to hear about NAntContrib. My guess is that it will get less traffic until it is mature -- but it might never mature without that traffic. Finally, managing one OSS project is difficult enough, managing two is much harder, managing two that interact is going to be harder still -- and if the maintainers are going to be the same on both projects (an obvious way to reduce the interaction complexity) then why have two in the first place? Just my 0.02 Best, Bill William E. Caputo ThoughtWorks, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
