Chris
At 09:55 PM 3/19/2003 -0800, Brian Deacon wrote:
Good teamwork. 'tween you and Scott, I think I got my brain wrapped around it. :)
IIRC, the fix was a Brutal Hack(tm) by Scott, and the bug is still in sharpziplib. Or did somebody hunt it down and kill it? Is this a non-trivial sharpziplib bug? Anybody taken a peak? How many sentences in a row can I end in a question mark?
B
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 16:42, Ian MacLean wrote: > OK kinda complicated but > this happens in the test phase where nant spawns a version of the just > built nant to run test targets. It the normal case it will run the test > targets only. However the tests have the compile targets as dependents. > with the file dates being wrong NAnt things it needs to rebuild them > - it the .cs dates are always more recent thatn the .dll. Since this is > the nant from \build... thats actually running and then trying to > rebuild itself its going to fail. > > Ian > > > Alright... I'll bite... what does the ziplib date bug have to do with > > the pdb file staying locked? (Snippet from Chris' log here) > > > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\work\nant-0.8.01\src\NAnt.DotNetTasks.build(12,10): > > External Program Failed: > > C:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.0.3705\csc.exe return 1 > > Output: > > fatal error CS0042: Unexpected error creating debug information file > > 'C:\work\nant-0.8.01\build\nant-0.8.01-debug\bin\NAnt.DotNetTasks.PDB' > > -- > > 'C:\work\nant-0.8.01\build\nant-0.8.01-debug\bin\NAnt.DotNetTasks.pdb: > > The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another > > process.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
_______________________________________________
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
