|
Hi,
Should all NAnt assembly (and all clasess within
these assemblies) continue to be marked COM visible ?
Is there really a demand for using NAnt as an COM
object ? Has anyone ever tried to use NAnt as a COM component ?
If so, for what purpose ?
Currently, there are lots of classes that are not
usable at all in a COM context because they :
- have no default public constructor
- have static methods
What's the use of making, for example, the
NAnt.Win32Tasks assembly visible to COM clients ?
In my opinion, we should make a decision on this
matter. Personally, I think it's of no use
to actually mark the assemblies COM visible if they're not really usable as COM
components, and if we're not planning on doing anything to support
this.
What do you think about this ?
Gert
|
- Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility Gert Driesen
- Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility Ian MacLean
- Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility Gert Driesen
- Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility Philip Nelson
