Yeah, lets not ship anything in 0.8.4 I think it has potential to introduce too many bugs this close to a release.
---------------------------------------- - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net - +61 (414) 610141 - > -----Original Message----- > From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:19 AM > To: Ian MacLean > Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: > Ready to tackle next release] > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:52 PM > Subject: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready > to tackle next release] > > > > I think I need to read up on filterchains a bit more. Is the > > functionality of filterchains a superset of filtersets ? > > Yes, filtersets are in fact very limited as they only support token > replacement. > > > > > It should be possible to use the same type discovery > mechanism we now > > use for Tasks and referencable elements to discover > filterreader classes > > in a given assembly. Or somthing similar using attributes. > > Yes, the discovery mechanism shouldn't be all that hard. > > Should I comment out the filterset code in the <copy> and > <move> tasks to > prevent users from using these until we've decided if we'll > replace it by > filterchain support (shortly) ? > > Gert > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
