> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:23 AM > Subject: [nant-dev] RE: filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] >
> Hi guys, > > Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines. If we had a FilterLink > attribute (continuing the analogy of a link in the chain :P). In > response to your earlier post Gert, I think it would be better if we > hold off on filterset's and strive for filterchains, even if it doesn't > make the 0.8.4 release. I agree, and I've already removed filterset support from the copy and move tasks (I still left in the type classes for now) > Will the replace task still be useful for 0.8.4? It is a useful task, but I think we should also hold off on this task until we've completed filterchain support ... You could add it to NAntContrib if you want to, as backward compatbility is not that important for that project ... Gert ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
