> I actually still prefer using the ${foo} syntax as :
>
> - its easier to distinguish properties (as Ian originally said)
> - it won't break compatibility for properties with numeric names (eg
${123})this is a little problem. I dont think it is good idea to have property with such name but expression certainly breaks compatibility here... :( > - corresponds with the MSbuild implementation. (not that this is importantà > - XSLT also uses a ($) prefix for variables Perl as well. Maybe this is reason why I dont like it :) I prefer clear languages as c# or Pascal or Python... .build files are for administrators and they could not be programmers in some cases. Clarity is big interest there IMO. > I also don't think we should use lt, gt, ... instead of ==, > for operators, > both XSLT and MSBuild use similar operators ... so I don't see why we should > be different ... > > In my opinion, it would be better to combine the best of XSLT and MSbuild > expressions, and try to be "compatibile" with these where it makes sense and > were these's no added value for not being compatible ... (eg. use the same > functions names, operators, ...) > > Just my 2 cents .. > > Gert ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
