> Do you think the functions need to be defined as static ? I was thinking > of making them public instance and passing a Project instance to the > containing objects constructor so that functions can have access to > various information inside the project - the same as tasks can now. It > might be worth marking each method with a [NAntCustomMethod] attribute > so that you can more finely control which methods get exported as functions.
Your idea looks ok. +1. > hmm - not sure about the casing. Current nant standard is for lower case > element and attribute names but no such restraints apply to attribute > values. Should we just use the .Net casing standards in this case ? +1 for all-lowercase names. Jarek ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
