I'm inclined to put new tasks like this in NAntContrib. Does anyone have a
major complaint about that? We can always move it later.
As for your implementation; It seems okay. I'm a little confused about what
you've done for the "on" attribute. It looks like you are not expanding,
supporting expressions, for those values unless an additional attribute
"dynamic" is set. What is the value in this?
It would seem cleaner to me to just let the "on" attribute be auto-expanded.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James C. Papp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> DependsTask Patch
>
> Here is an implementation of the <depends/> task. It allows the use of
dynamic
> dependencies which was possible with earlier versions of NAnt through the
> <call/> task, but with current changes is now longer allowed (deprecation
of
> the force attribute).
>
> It is particularly useful for handling dependencies that change based on
some
> input conditions/parameters, or when the dependencies are not known until
> runtime.
>
> Here's a quick example of the possibilities:
>
> <target name="foo">
> <if test="${some-option}">
> <depends on="A, B, ${set-at-runtime-target}/>
> </if>
> </target>
>
> For more information about this, check out the thread: "[nant-dev] Change
to
> "call" task makes upgrade difficult"
>
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/nant-developers%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg03105.html
>
> Personally, I think it should be part of the core because it really is an
> expansion of the <target/> depends attribute (they go hand-in-hand),
however; I
> would be just as happy if everyone decided to stick it in NAntContrib.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
