> > Yeah, I was considering the same thing. I also wondered whether this
> > could mean that there could be a unified type system. Filesets, string
> > properties etc.
>
> You mean storing a fileset inside a property? Interesting idea.
Oh - we already mention it before. Would be great! And also + operator in
expressions could be overriden to fileset merge :) And functions with
fileset argument could exists instead of string as refid to fileset etc etc
etc...
Still we should be compatible with current id="" syntax so typedefs should
define property of its type?
Sum: +1 for it!
btw: maybe we will find some nicer syntax for merging here? e.g.
<property type="fileset" name="id1" value="${id1+id2}"/>
> Gert, Ian, Scott - what do you think about typed properties?
>
> Jarek
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
