My vote: let's NOT support it - I'd say more - let's disallow it. Simplicity
is an important thing.
The only advantage of XML namespaces I see is technical beauty and XSD
schema support for extensible intellisense - IMHO it's not worth it.
>From my experience I can say that it's really difficult to explain the
concept of XML namespaces and URNs to first-time users of XML. Based on
this, I think that using URIs as xml namespaces is the most confusing thing
on the planet ("what? there's no file under http://tempuri.org/";) . Most
people are well off without namespaces.
XSDs can be generated usign <schema> task today, and I think it's good
enough for most cases.
Jarek
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nant-Developers (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 11:58 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] NAnt & Namespaces
> Hi,
>
> Currently the NAnt support for namespaces is very limited, definitely when
> compared to Ant (http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/namespace.html).
>
> Just want to get the discussion on this topic going ...
>
> Gert
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
> Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
> digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
> unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
