It sounds like NAnt is now doing what VS does so that sounds like the right thing to me.
Files that are *created* (and not editted) by a build process should be marked as 'ignore', and I believe that should fix the problem (certainly that works when using CVS). Furthermore, we're used to automated builds having a 'clean' task - if necessary they could have a 'teardown' task to remove any temporary artifacts, but I think a combination of ignored files/directories and just a 'clean' build task is fine. Mike On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:41:34 +0100, Nicklas Norling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To me this is a bug in subversion. One of the most obvious use-cases aren't > supported; automated builds. > I'd love to see many of Subversions commands have a --force parameter so > that > I didn't have to work around it. > > I do howevery think that if a task is supposed to do what VS does, then it > should > do so. Otherwise one would have to invent different hacks for different > compilers. > Remember that users of VS automatically ends up with these bin and obj > folders and > have to deal with them as well. > > /Nicke > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Aliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 5 november 2004 10:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ! nant > Subject: [nant-dev] SVN+latest NAnt in automated environment like CCNet > > Hi all, > > just FYI latest NAnt change behaviour of build process little and now > <solution> task produce obj folder under project directory. This match > VS.NET behaviour what is good. What is bad it could broke automated builds! > > I notice that when some user want to delete entire project under SVN. Since > local repository is modified by NAnt build process (new subdir), svn is > unable to delete project and fail with message > > <exec program="c:\program files\subversion\bin\svn.exe" commandline="update > --non-interactive ${build.dir}"/> External Program Failed: c:\program > files\subversion\bin\svn.exe (return > code was 1) > svn: Won't delete locally modified directory c:/ccnet/foo' > svn: Left locally modified or unversioned files > > Even Revert+Update do not help (revert do not touch unversioned files). > Deleting all obj folders (what is only solution I see) could be quite > performance hit for very large projects. And, of course, more work, more > complex .build script etc. I'd say I liked old behaviour more... > > Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Ccnet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-user > -- mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ | http://www.thoughtworks.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
