When I said that it integrated a lot better, I just meant that I was
able to set up an <exec> task and have it work. With the SF Ncover, I
never did get their nant task to work.
If it helps, here is my <exec> task.
<exec program="${ncover.bin.dir}\NCover.Console.exe"
verbose="${isVerbose}"
workingdir="${bin.dir}"
failonerror="false"
resultproperty="ncover.exitcode">
<arg value="/c "${nunit.bin.dir}\nunit-console.exe"
"${test.name}.dll /xml=${test.result.file.path.xml}"" />
<arg value="/a "Intel.Data"" />
<arg value="/o "${test.coverage.file.path.xml}"" />
<arg value="/l "${test.coverage.file.path}.log"" />
</exec>
Jason
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Gary Feldman
>Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:17 AM
>To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Error while integrating ncover into
>dailybuild with nant.
>
>Morris, Jason wrote:
>
>>Where did you get NCover from?
>>
>>http://ncover.org/
>>
>>- or -
>>
>>http://ncover.sourceforge.net/
>>
>>IIRC, I had this problem when I used the version from
>SourceForge, but
>>if you go to ncover.org, that version seems to work a lot better.
>>Plus, I found ncover.org's version integrated with nAnt a lot easier.
>>
>>
>I've been using the ncover.org version as well, but I wasn't
>aware of any integration. I've resorted to a painstakingly
>constructed exec task. (It's painstaking because I'm using
>NCover to invoke nunit-console, which in turn invokes the
>tests, so there are several levels of quoting needed in the
>commandline attribute.)
>
>I believe the Sourceforge version comes with a NAnt task, but
>I haven't seen any in the NCover.org version. If there is
>one, where can I find it?
>
>>Jason
>>
>>PS I don't know the history of this project, so I don't know why the
>>differences in code between the two projects with the same name.
>>
>>
>I've always presumed that the projects were always
>independent, and just happened to use the same name without
>realizing that someone else was also using it. For what it's
>worth, the NCover.org version began life on GotDotNet, but at
>least at that time, GotDotNet lacked the stability and
>convenience needed for multi-person open source development.
>
>It would be nice if they resolved the name conflict. Flip a
>coin, hold a charity auction (whichever one raises the most
>gets to decide), or duel at twenty paces - I don't care how
>it's resolved as long as it's resolved. Or the market could
>decide by abandoning one of them.
>
>Gary
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
>discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
>_______________________________________________
>nant-developers mailing list
>nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
