And since our competetive product MSBuild do not work on 1.0/1.1 platform, there could be some use of that.
For, me personally, same as Ryan apply. Ing. Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com] > Looking at the current state, I think it's too difficult to maintain support for all of the .NET frameworks. Can we drop support for .NET 1.x and beginning beginning .NET 2.0 as a minimum? If there are no objections, I am going to change the default release from "set-net-1.0-framework-configuration" to "set-net-2.0-framework-configuration" > Speaking personally, I have no problem dropping .NET 1.X since all of my work as of late has been based on .NET 2.0 and greater. However, I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
