Hello,
I have also used Doxygen (mainly for C/C++), so here are a few additional
comments for consideration:
1) Does Doxygen share the same markup style as NDoc/3? Would updating the
markup to a new format create a large effort?
2) Does the 'generate doc' task also create .CHM files? I know Doxygen also
relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we probably want to get away
from as a dependency.
Regards,
Charles
--- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski <skol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Leszek Ciesielski <skol...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)
> To: "Ryan Boggs" <rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com>, "Charles Chan"
> <cchan...@users.sourceforge.net>, nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM
> Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all
> other documentation generators
> hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the
> time the
> other programs needed (for a code base larger than
> NAnt). It does,
> however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a
> show-stopper for
> some people. On the other hand, this output is fully
> skinable, it's
> just html after all.
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
