----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] 0.8.3 final
> Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > > >Is there any updated roadmap to 1.0 ? I've checked the > > > > > > > >http://nant.sourceforge.net/todo.html > > > >and looks like we've silently got a lot of features planned for > >0.8, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1 into the current version. > > > > > > > yeah - thats well out of date. Now is definately a good time to revisit > it and decide on the list of features/bug fixes for a 1.0 release. In my opinion, high on the list of things to do are : - support for building locazized applications (for both the compiler tasks and for the solution task) - datatype documentation - packaging (one distribution for all supported frameworks, or separate distributions) Note: I'm not saying these are all on MY to-do list :-) > > > adding a nice GUI installer (I can make one using > >NSIS if you want), > > > that would be great if you could. Its on my todo list but with quite a > few other things in front of it. :) > > >integrating some external GUI tools (like NAntMenu > >shell extension, script editor - is the idea still alive?) and it's ready to go. > > > > > > > I contacted the author of NAntMenu to see if its ok to package. Waiting > for his response. Another one is the NUnit2Report task which is a > seperate project right now. I'm not sure if we should add external tools to the NAnt distribution. I think we should focus on the core build system itself and on supplying "generally useful" tasks (which NUnit2Report is indeed). We should, however, include a list of third party extensions to NAnt. That way more users will discover these tools, and as public interest grows, more people will be likely to join the authors in improving these tools. I think most active committers are busy enough without adding even more to their to-do list ... thank god we're getting payed good money for all of this :-) lol > > >Maybe the GUI installer can also be one of the products of a daily build? > > > > > > > good idea. I don't see why not. Add the NSIS build process to the > nightly build script. NSISTask anyone ? I agree that it's a good idea, but it wouldn't be cross-platform .... Gert ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
