Hi Felice,

Don't you mean <script> instead of <Xcript> in your example below?
Neither works for me. Also, the ScriptTask in nant/examples also doesn't
work for me. I tried it with the nightly build from yesterday as well.

Perhaps this is some sort of Windows-only .Net functionality that is
disabled somehow on Mono?

Jeroen

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 15:36 -0500, Felice Vittoria wrote:
> <p align="left"><b><font face="Arial" size="2">GFI MailSecurity's HTML threat engine 
> found HTML scripts in this email and has disabled them.</font></b></p>Jeroen,
> 
> 1. Change </Xcript> to </Xcript> at the end.  So it would look like this:
> 
>     <Xcript language="C#"><!--
>         <code><![CDATA[
>             [Function("version-greater-or-equal")]
>             public bool VersionGreaterOrEqual (string version1, string
> version2)            {
>                 Version v1 = new Version (version1);
>                 Version v2 = new Version (version2);
>                 return v1 >= v2;
>             }
>         ]]></code>
>     --></Xcript>
> 
> This works .. I tried it out.  I used your version of Nant as well as the latest.
> 
> 2.  I got that error too when I tried nant.version.  So .. as a workaround I used 
> mynant.version, mynant.currentversion to see get this example to work. 
> 
> HTH,
> Felice
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeroen
> Zwartepoorte
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 1:21 PM
> To: Castro, Edwin Gabriel (Firing Systems Engr.)
> Cc: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Nant-users] checking nant version
> 
> 
> <p align=\"left\"><b><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">GFI MailSecurity's HTML threat 
> engine found HTML scripts in this email and has disabled them.</font></b></p>Hmm, 
> nant is not recognizing the <Xcript><!-- task:
> 
> Invalid element <script>. Unknown task or datatype.
> 
> It doesn't seem to matter where i put the <script> task in the build
> file. Is this a bug in a recent nightly build? (i'm using
> nant-0.85-20040809).
> 
> Btw: it seems "nant.version" is a predefined property. So i don't need
> the "${assembly::get-version(nant::get-location())}" bit. Are these
> properties documented somewhere?
> 
> Jeroen
> 
> p.s. relevant bits from default.build below (does the greater than sign
> in "v1 >= v2" need to be escaped btw?):
> 
>     --><!-- script hack for checking nant versions --><!--
>     <script language="C#">
>         <code><![CDATA[
>             [Function("version-greater-or-equal")]
>             public bool VersionGreaterOrEqual (string version1, string
> version2)            {
>                 Version v1 = new Version (version1);
>                 Version v2 = new Version (version2);
>                 return v1 >= v2;
>             }
>         ]]></code>
>     --></Xcript>
>                                                                                 
>     <!-- check for pkg-config dependencies and initialize properties -->
>     <target name="init" description="initializes build properties">
>         <!-- check for an up-to-date nant -->
>         <if test="${not(script::version-greater-or-equal(nant.version,
> nant.neededversion))}">
>             <echo message="MonoDevelop requires nant version
> ${nant.neededversion} or greater"/>
>             <fail message="nant version not supported"/>
>         </if>
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:45 -0500, Castro, Edwin Gabriel (Firing Systems
> Engr.) wrote:
> > I would recommend that you use the <Xcript><!-- task to create your own
> > custom function taking two strings and returning a boolean. You can then
> > use the System.Version class to actually do the comparison. Something
> > like this:
> > 
> > <script language="C#">
> >   <code><![CDATA[
> >     [Function("version-greater-or-equal")]
> >     public bool VersionGreaterOrEqual(string version1, string version2)
> >     {
> >       Version v1 = new Version(version1);
> >       Version v2 = new Version(version2);
> >       return v1 >= v2;
> >     }
> >   ]]></code>
> > --></Xcript>
> > 
> > You can then call it like this:
> > 
> > <property name="nant.version" value="0.85.1684.0"/>
> > <property name="nant.currentversion"
> > value="${assembly::get-version(nant::get-location())}"/>
> > 
> > <if test="${script::version-greater-or-equal(nant.currentversion,
> > nant.version)}">
> >   <!-- Do something -->
> > </if>
> > 
> > I'm sure there are other ways too!
> > 
> > --
> > Edwin G. Castro
> > Firing Systems Engineer
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen
> > Zwartepoorte
> > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 8:26 AM
> > To: Gert Driesen
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] checking nant version
> > 
> > Hi Gert,
> > 
> > Thanks for the quick reply. Still have a question though:
> > 
> > How do i actually check if the current nant version is >= than the
> > version i need?
> > 
> > I now have this:
> > 
> > <property name="nant.version" value="0.85.1684.0"/>
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > <property name="nant.currentversion" value="${assembly::get-version
> > (nant::get-location())}"/>
> > 
> > How do i compare these two values? It looks like i could extract the
> > major, minor, build and revision numbers using the version::get-*
> > functions, but i still need some sort of string::compare function in
> > order to actually compare them...
> > 
> > How do i do this? (i don't see any functions in the docs which support
> > this)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jeroen
> > 
> > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 19:06 +0200, Gert Driesen wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeroen Zwartepoorte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 4:28 PM
> > > Subject: [Nant-users] checking nant version
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Is there some example nant XML that checks that nant is actually 
> > > > able to build the project in question? So "nant.version >= 
> > > > 0.85-20040810" for example? So you can tell the user that he has to 
> > > > upgrade his nant if he wants to build the project.
> > > 
> > > You can use assembly::get-version(nant::get-location()) to get the 
> > > full version of NAnt.
> > > 
> > > > Seems very useful to me when you're using the latest stuff like 
> > > > filterchains. Also prevents a lot of possible FAQ from appearing on
> > irc.
> > > 
> > > I agree. We'll need to think of a more generic way to accomplish this.
> > > 
> > > > btw: do the nant devs hang around on irc? If so, which server and 
> > > > what channel?
> > > 
> > > I hang around on the #mono channel on ircd.gimp.org
> > > 
> > > Gert
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save
> > 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nant-users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Nant-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Nant-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Reply via email to