Might not any new development released
lately, but I’ve done some cool stuff! I haven’t pushed this back into CVS yet
(don’t have commit rights). But I have been able to cut down a 27 minute
build to a 10 minute build by modifying the resgen task. If you look closely at
the resgen task you’ll see that it copies all the references that you
specify in the csc task to a temp directory so resgen can work (1.1 .Net
framework – I understand this is much improved in 2.0). Since we
have lots of large DLL’s in our references this causes problems, i.e.
resgen takes longer then the csc due to having to copy DLL’s. So I just
made the “temp” directory be the DLL output directory of the csc
task (had do some stuff like having it not delete the directory when it was
completed, etc). No more DLL copying!! Anyhow, even if there isn’t a lot of
new releases, there are a ton of new things that can be worked on. So,
just ‘cause the guys haven’t committed, doesn’t mean that you
should give up on Nant. It’s got a great future! Charlie P.S. This may have been more appropriate
for the dev list – sorry if this is not of interest. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivo Limmen I share your concen, I
also would like to keep using NANT, as much as I love avoiding using Microsoft
products :). On 9/26/05, Hart,
Leo < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: It's a reasonable question I think. Besides, there are
plenty of |
- [Nant-users] No more development? Robert Schneider
- RE: [Nant-users] No more development? Gert Driesen
- Re: [Nant-users] No more development? Martin Gainty
- RE: [Nant-users] No more development? Robert Schneider
- RE: [Nant-users] No more development? Gert Driesen
- RE: [Nant-users] No more development? Hart, Leo
- Re: [Nant-users] No more development? Ivo Limmen
- RE: [Nant-users] No more development? Morss, Charlie