> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 25 mei 2006 9:54 > To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] NANT taking longer than the > standard IDE compile? What's up? > > > I'm definitely not complaining, because NAnt is a wonderful > tool, but given that by your admission and by my experience, > the current nightly builds are far more stable that 0.85, > would it not be a good idea to make the next release a proper > release rather than another RC? > > There could even be an argument to calling it 0.9 as it now > includes support for .NET 2.0 which 0.85 didn't and this is a > fairly significant version milestone. > > There is always going to be more that can and will be added > to NAnt, but for business organisations, it is often easier > to persuade managers to adopt a "stable" release version of a > tool that one that is a nightly build, beta or RC.
I understand and share your concerns, but I prefer to first have a short test period (2 weeks or so) for the RC before we label it as final. I want to ensure no regressions have been introduced in the nightly builds, and people tend to test release candidates more thoroughly. Gert ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ NAnt-users mailing list NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
