Hey Chris, I added the additional readregistry item you emailed earlier to the nant.exe.config file. It should be in the next nightly release that is being uploaded now. Please test and report any other problems you guys see.
Thanks, Ryan On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Christopher Brandt <xtopher.bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem only exists if you have a wonky version of the 6.0 SDK. Most > seemed to be named 6.0A, but on our server it was installed as just 6.0. > > > --- > Chris. > > Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection. - Mark Twain > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Bob Archer <bob.arc...@amsi.com> wrote: >> >> I use the latest nightly and it works ok. But, I explicity let the >> targetframework property in the scripts. >> >> >> >> I also use the msbuild task rather then the csc task.. but I assume it >> uses the same mechanism to determine which to use. >> >> >> >> BOb >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Christopher Brandt [mailto:xtopher.bra...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:14 PM >> To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: [NAnt-users] Target Framework net-3.5 Configuration >> >> >> >> This is related to my previous post on Windows 7 & VS2008. >> >> After some help I realized that the target framework on my desktop was >> .Net 3.5 whereas on my build server (Windows 2003 Server) it was .Net 2.0. >> The was causing some problems between the two environment in how csc.exe was >> importing includes. The build server required our files to explicitly >> specify the paths to the .Net 3.5 dlls, but on my desktop it choked on build >> files with explicit paths (error was that the libraries had already been >> imported). >> >> The difference between the target frameworks, terms of how NAnt functions, >> is specified in the NAnt.exe.config file. The configuration for each target >> framework is specified with the reference assemblies to load. That is why in >> one environment they are loaded by NAnt and in the other our build file had >> to specify where to get them from. >> >> The root of my problem then was why my build server was still targeting >> the net-2.0 framework rather than 3.5. We've had .Net 3.5 installed on that >> server for well over a year (has it been out that long?). NAnt attempts to >> determine the highest available framework as the default. In our case the >> best it could find was 2.0. The reason is in the configuration for the >> net-3.5 framework. The <project> element in the config file lists the places >> where NAnt attempts to look for clues to see what frameworks are available. >> We are running 0.86 on the build server and it's config file specifies that >> it should look for a registry key: >> >> SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft >> SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\WinSDKNetFxTools\InstallationFolder >> >> However on our build server the key is in: >> >> SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft >> SDKs\Windows\v6.0\WinSDKNetFxTools\InstallationFolder >> >> v6.0 not v6.0A >> >> I see that the configuration in NAnt 0.9 has v6.0A, v6.1, v7.0. And my >> desktop does have v6.0A. >> >> So a simple modification to the NAnt.exe.config to add a <readregistry> >> element for v6.0, fix our problem. >> >> I would guess that we're not alone with this wonky SDK version. So someone >> should probably add the the following to at least the configuration for the >> 0.9 build: >> >> <readregistry >> property="sdkInstallRoot" >> key="SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft >> SDKs\Windows\v6.0\WinSDKNetFxTools\InstallationFolder" >> hive="LocalMachine" >> failonerror="false" /> >> >> --- >> Chris Brandt >> >> Continuous improvement is better than delayed perfection. - Mark Twain > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > NAnt-users mailing list > NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users > > -- Thanks, Ryan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ NAnt-users mailing list NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
