Maybe my phrasing was a bit off. Obviously they are useful for someone. I have no problem calling it
Nant.Experimental. Optional just came from the equivalent in Ant.
Ian
Hi Ian,
<<
I'm not so sure. I see NAnt.optional as a place for new tasks that may or
may not be useful.
I guess this is what I don't like. Useful? Uhh... If someone wrote the damn thing, I'm sure *they* considered it useful. Who are we to decide what is "useful" and what not? But, if you guys decide we should be so bold as to take on that decision, then it becomes much easier: don't accept things that are *not useful* in the first place, and now you don't need NAnt.Optional again. If you were to say Nant.Experimental, well, that would convey a completely different meaning .... jejejeje
-- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
NAntContrib-Developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nantcontrib-developer
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ NAntContrib-Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nantcontrib-developer
