Ian MacLean wrote:
Swoogan wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
.NUnit2Report is GPL. I've contacted the author through SF to see if he/she has any input/objections. I suppose, if he/she does not reply in a timely fashion, we could fork the project.
Sure - that would be great. How is the NUnit2Report code licenced ? We should also try to contact to original author to see if he has any objections to making the code a part of NAntContrib - with a relicencing if its necessary.
Ian
Agreed. Its always good to ask nicely first :)
Ian
Well, it's been a couple of weeks now, and I haven't heard anything from the maintainer of NUnit2Report. I think we can safely move this into NAntContrib.
I think the package is good as it is, but I'm not 100% certain. One thing that I'm not sure it's doing right is respecting the basedir property on the project for relative pathing. I'll look into devising some unittests to go along with this, then we can look at merging it in.
Colin
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NAntContrib-Developer mailing list NAntContrib-Developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nantcontrib-developer
