Yes, anything under "api" directory or sub-dir implements API and are
considered fairly stable. Anything else is considered as internal
-Sundar
On Saturday 21 June 2014 01:06 AM, Greg Brail wrote:
Thank you!
It's my understanding that the "jdk.nashorn.api.scripting" package is
considered fairly stable and using it my code is "OK," so I may use that
technique.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:22 AM, A. Sundararajan <
[email protected]> wrote:
You can evaluate:
function getScriptTrace() {
try {
throw new Error();
} catch (e) {
return e.stack
}
}
in your script and call the same from java code using
javax.script.Invocable.invokeFunction. ("stack" property and other
related extensions are documented here: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/
display/Nashorn/Nashorn+extensions).
Or if you're okay with nashorn specific extension, you can use this API
from java code.
public static StackTraceElement[] jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.
NashornException.getScriptFrames(Throwable th)
Hope this helps,
-Sundar
On Friday 20 June 2014 09:35 PM, Greg Brail wrote:
Is there a way in Nashorn or javax.script to get a clean JavaScript-only
stack trace (not a Java stack trace, but only containing JavaScript code)
out of an exception thrown by a script? I don't see anything in the
Nashorn
Wiki or javax.script -- apologies if I'm missing something there.
For instance, I can get a full Java stack trace when my script fails, but
I'd like to ignore all the Java stuff and give users the stack trace that
they would get if they were running the "plain" JavaScript natively rather
than inside Java.
