+1
> On 05 Jun 2015, at 10:44, A. Sundararajan
> <sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Please approve.
>
> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081809
> jdk9 review thread:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-June/004664.html
> jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8081809/8u60/webrev.00/
>
> Not backported 'as is' - as there are jdk9 specific classes that don't exist
> in jdk8u-dev. But the subset backported is backported 'as is'. I'm still
> CC'ing nashorn-dev.
>
> Thanks,
> -Sundar
