Hm… this seems to be an issue with shared scope calls; that’s why it’s
sensitive to the number of similar statements.
That said, here’s some thoughts:
1. Instead of
if (self instanceof ScriptObject &&
((ScriptObject)self).hasWithScope()) {
you should be able to just use
if (self instanceof ScriptObject) {
As then you’ll evaluate getWithScopeObject and test it for being null anyway.
This way, you avoid walking the prototype chain twice.
2. That said, I guess hasWithScope could be reimplemented simply as
public boolean hasWithScope() {
return getWithScopeObject() != null;
}
as both have very similar code, so it’d reduce to it nicely. (I understand that
you haven’t changed that, but since you were in the vicinity of that code, you
might as wel do it… It’s also fine if you leave it alone as it is.)
3. One of the statements in the test is indented differently than the others.
4. What happens if there’s _two_ with scopes, and the JavaImporter is in the
outer one? Does this fix still work? E.g.:
var imports = new JavaImporter(java.lang);
var dummy = { x: 42, y: 13 }
with (imports) {
with (dummy) {
function func() {
System.out.println('a');
System.out.println('a');
System.out.println('a');
System.out.println('a');
System.out.println('a');
System.out.println('a');
System.out.println('a');
};
func();
}
}
Attila.
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 7:13 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy
> <priya.lakshmi.muthusw...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please review JDK-8191301 : JavaImporter fails to resolve imported elements
> within functions, that contain too many statements
>
> JBS : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191301
> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8191301/webrev.00/
>
> Thanks,
> Priya
>
>
