http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Justice-Torture-Memo.html?ei=50
94&en=e316c91c0cec7a7f&hp=&ex=1104555600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print&
position=

December 31, 2004

New U.S. Memo Backs Off Torture Arguments
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 11:16 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department released a rewritten legal memo
on what constitutes torture, backing away from its own assertions prior to
the Iraqi prison abuse scandal that torture had to involve ``excruciating
and agonizing pain.''

The 17-page memo omitted two of the most controversial assertions made in
now-disavowed 2002 Justice Department documents: that President Bush, as
commander in chief in wartime, had authority superseding U.S. anti-torture
laws and that U.S. personnel had several legal defenses against criminal
liability in such cases.

The new document said torture violates U.S. and international law.

``Consideration of the bounds of any such authority would be inconsistent
with the president's unequivocal directive that United States personnel not
engage in torture,'' said the memo from Daniel Levin, acting chief of the
Office of Legal Counsel, to Deputy Attorney General James Comey.

Critics in Congress and many legal experts say the original documents set
up a legal framework that led to abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq,
in Afghanistan and at the U.S. prison camp for terror suspects at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. After the Iraqi prison abuses came to light, the
Justice Department in June disavowed its previous legal reasoning and set
to work on the replacement document.

The Justice Department memo, dated Thursday, was released less than a week
before the Senate Judiciary Committee was to consider Bush's nomination of
his chief White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales, to replace John Ashcroft
as attorney general.

Democrats have said they would question Gonzales closely on memos he wrote
that were similar to the now-disavowed Justice Department documents that
critics said appeared to justify torture.

The release also coincided with continuing revelations of possible detainee
abuse, most recently a series of memos from FBI agents uncovered in an
American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit alleging instances of Defense
Department wrongdoing during a variety of interrogations.

The new Justice Department memo sets a far different tone, beginning with
this sentence: ``Torture is abhorrent both to American law and values and
to international norms.''

The document, again directly contradicting the previous version, says
torture need not be limited to pain ``equivalent in intensity to the pain
accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of
bodily function, or even death.''

Instead, the memo concludes that anti-torture laws passed by Congress
equate torture with physical suffering ``even if it does not involve severe
physical pain'' but still must be more than ``mild and transitory.'' That
can include mental suffering under certain circumstances, but it would not
have to last for months or years, as the previous document said.

``This damage need not be permanent, but it must continue for a prolonged
period of time,'' the memo says.

In addition, the memo clearly states that U.S. personnel involved in
interrogations cannot contend that their actions were motivated by national
security needs or other reasons. And, it says, the interrogator cannot
justify torture after telling the victim that he could avoid it if only he
would cooperate.

``Presumably, that has frequently been the case with torture, but that fact
does not make the practice of torture any less abhorrent or unlawful,'' the
Justice Department memo says.

Most of the original memos were signed by then-assistant Attorney General
Jay Bybee, who was writing in the shadow of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror
attacks as government officials scrambled to confront a new terrorist foe.
Bybee is now a judge on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San
Francisco.

The Pentagon, Justice Department and CIA have opened numerous
investigations into allegations of prisoner abuse and some detainee deaths
stemming from the war on terror and in Iraq. Several U.S. soldiers have
also been subjected to court-martial proceedings for their roles in the
alleged abuse, some of which was documented in photographs from Abu Ghraib
circulated worldwide earlier in 2004.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/1dTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nat-International/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to