On Mar 17, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Rémi Després wrote:>
With SAM, hosts know their global addresses, and can use them, e.g.
with
SCTP or Shim6.
In my understanding, this is a difference (an an important one).
Yes, this is an important difference between SAM and NAT66, although
comparing them is like comparing apples and oranges, since they don't
solve the same problems...
IMO, SAM does not provide a solution to the Address Independence
requirement, as the local hosts need to know their global addresses.
Therefore, I am not sure why it is being proposed for discussion in
the IPv6 Address Independence (6AI) BOF. Could you explain?
Margaret
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
