Margaret Wasserman wrote: > I think we have some disagreement about the meaning/scope of the term > "NAT66". > > In my experience, the terms NAT44, NAT64, NAT46 and NAT66 are the > _names_ of specific IETF proposals. The terms IPv4 NAT and IPv6 NAT are > used to generically identify IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT devices and IPv6-to-IPv6 > NAT devices, respectively.
I've been using NAT66 as the generic name more than IPv6 NAT, which seems more cumbersome. But I could be convinced to use xyNAT as the generic convention. Whatever names are chosen, I think it's going to take some time to get everyone to use them consistently. Keith _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
