On 2009-04-01 04:36, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > It sounds like we are fairly certain that homes and some small > businesses will be given prefixes longer than /48 by their providers.
Yes. It's running code. > Are we also convinced that those small networks will require the address > independence feature provided by NAT66? I guess this question boils > down to whether we expect two (or more) hosts within a small network to > communicate directly with each other using global IPv6 addresses. Well, I've been told often enough that small sites will sooner or later want all the features available to big sites. It's crystal-ball gazing of course, but anything else seems like a risky assumption. So /64 seems necessary to support. Where we should stop, IMHO, is in offering any comfort to ISPs that want to try to get away with /128. Brian _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
