RJ Atkinson wrote: > Gentle People, > > At the 6AI BOF held at IETF last week, there seemed to be > rough consensus on the definitions for these 2 terms: > > IPv6 NAT: Generic term for any sort of NAT/NAPT/SAT > for IPv6::IPv6 deployment > > NAT66: Precise, specific, term for the proposal > documented in draft-mrw-behave-nat66-*.txt
I think it's useful to be able to describe not just IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT, but any kind of NAT between IPvx and IPvy. Since there's already some established use for NAT66 and some other examples of that pattern, I suggest we use the pattern xyNAT for NATs between x and y. (I further suggest that we _not_ author any specific proposals with names of the form xyNAT.) _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
