On 3 Apr 2009, at 13:07, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:
You forgot to include my quote of your previous E-mail:
Not at all. I could not puzzle out how the quoted text
could possibly relate to your note...and frankly I still
cannot puzzle that out.
If a routing prefix is allocated that is longer than 64 bits,
then you may need address amplification in order to use SLAAC.
The SLAAC protocol breaks if the routing prefix exceeds 64 bits,
as near as the IAB could tell when the issue came before them:
<http://www.iab.org/appeals/kre-ipng-address-arch-draft-standard-response.html
>
The need for
"address amplification" derives from a disparity in the size of the
routing prefix given by ISPs and that which the end user wants to use.
I can't even parse that sentence, let alone lex it for meaning.
Any road, I still don't think your comments related to my
posted comments at all.
Yours,
Ran
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
