Roger Marquis wrote: > Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote: >> While I agree that people will continue to use NAT even if we tell them >> not to, just like some people will continue to smoke > and Keith Moore wrote: >> reading this, it's hard to escape the impression that you are out to >> make the IPv6 Internet as dysfunctional as the IPv4 Internet. > > Instead of empty rhetoric I would recommend that any critique of NAT, > positive or negative, address all of the reasons why it has become so > popular.
Perhaps one of the reasons why it's popular is that there are far too many network administrators in the world who believe that the network exists for _their_ convenience, or allow users to run only the applications that the network administrators want them to run. They prefer having crippled networks because it makes their jobs easier. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
