On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:22, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
For folks who are hanging out here because you would rather spend your time blocking my work than doing your own... You have won. You might as well go somewhere else and do something productive now.
For the record, I'm in complete agreement with the decision of the AD's on what should be the proper course of action with the NAT66 draft, and the mixed message from the IAB and the IESG seems to me appropriate, given the amount of controversy on the subject.
That said, I'm expecting to end up having to cope at some point with middleboxes like what NAT66 intends to specify, so, despite my architectural reservations about it, I'm planning to provide constructive remarks on any forthcoming revisions of the draft. Hence, my call to stay on topic.
-- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
