> > James, > > I believe what I asserted was the following.... > > > "The factual thing that can be said about NAT is that it obscures the literal > IP address assigned to an end device from a source on the other side of the > NAT boundary. For some that is a desired effect for others it's an > undesirable problem....... > > ...... > > You are not going to achieve that level of "obscurity" without some form of > address translation....and any solution that you do provide to achieve that > obscurity will have much of the same side effects that todays NAT does." Actually, this seems like what IPv6 Privacy Addresses were made for.
Keith
_______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
