Margaret,

Section 11 of your draft states that the ULA prefix should be selected randomly.

Have you considered selection of ULA prefix(es) for internal network in such a 
manner that it/they can be translated to NAT uplink's /64 prefix in checksum 
neutral fashion?

Additionally, if stateful address autoconfiguration (DHCPv6) is used in the 
network deploying NAT66, have you considered that the DHCPv6 server could 
choose /128 addresses in a fashion allowing checksum neutral translation by 
NAT66?

Best regards,

Teemu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of ext Margaret Wasserman
> Sent: 18. lokakuuta 2010 22:05
> To: NAT66 HappyFunBall
> Subject: [nat66] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mrw-nat66-00
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I just submitted a new version of the NAT66 draft (see below).  This
> one includes a NAT66 algorithm for prefixes longer than /48.
> 
> I also changed the name of the document to remove the pointer to the
> behave WG, and I updated my contact information.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Margaret
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <[email protected]>
> > Date: October 18, 2010 2:49:17 PM EDT
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mrw-nat66-00
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-mrw-nat66-00.txt has been successfully
> > submitted by Margaret Wasserman and posted to the IETF repository.
> >
> > Filename:    draft-mrw-nat66
> > Revision:    00
> > Title:               IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Address Translation (NAT66)
> > Creation_date:       2010-10-18
> > WG ID:               Independent Submission
> > Number_of_pages: 15
> >
> > Abstract:
> > This document describes a stateless, transport-agnostic IPv6-to-IPv6
> > Network Address Translation (NAT66) function that provides the
> > address independence benefit associated with IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT (NAT44)
> > while minimizing, but not completely eliminating, the problems
> > associated with NAT44.
> >
> >
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat.
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nat66 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

Reply via email to