I believe that's off-topic on this list.

On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Rémi Després wrote:

> 
> Le 3 mars 2011 à 20:48, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
>> ...
>> Of course. PI has the cost of exploding the BGP4 table.
>> NPTv6 has the cost of destroying address transparency.
>> 
>> Since SHIM6 has neither of these costs, are you surprised
>> that I prefer it?
> 
> SHIM6 is a solution, but AFAIK it needs that hosts know:
> - their global addresses
> - means to force outgoing paths that go via the right CPE's (an 
> ingress-filtering constraint) 
> 
> In a site using ULAs and having several links, a complement is therefore 
> needed. 
> SAM is an approach for this (ref. draft-despres-softwire-sam-01 - sec. 3.3), 
> and AFAIK the only documented one so far.
> Would you agree on this?
> 
> RD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nat66 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

Reply via email to