And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 15:56:47 -0500 
From: *Noquisi* or Evergreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-WorldNet (Win95; U) 
X-Accept-Language: en 
To: serendipity , BM Times 
Subject: 'DIPITY PANUPS: New Findings On Agent Orange Dioxin In Vietnam 
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

sounds like chemical warfare to me.... 
  
  
*** 
Pesticide Action Network 
North America 
Updates Service 
http://www.panna.org/panna/ 
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

December 4, 1998 

Agent Orange and Dioxin in Vietnam: New Findings 

A report released by a Canadian consulting firm calls for urgent 
international attention to problems created by U.S. spraying of 
Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. The study found that the 
spraying has resulted in contamination of the country's food 
chain which in turn has led to serious environmental and health 
problems. 

The firm, Hatfield Consultants Ltd., has spent the past five 
years studying the effects of the herbicides sprayed in Vietnam 
from 1962 to 1971. During that period, the U.S. military carried 
out over 6,500 missions as part of Operation Ranch Hand, spraying 
approximately 72 million liters of herbicides on more than 1.5 
million hectares (about 10% of South Vietnam). About one third of 
the area was sprayed more than once, and 52,000 hectares were 
sprayed more than four times. According to official U.S. reports, 
Operation Ranch Hand destroyed 14% of South Vietnam's forests, 
including 50% of the mangrove forests. 

Agent Orange accounted for approximately 60% of the herbicides 
used by the military to destroy forests and crops during this 
time. This chemical was a mixture of the herbicides 2,4-D and 
2,4,5-T and also contained dioxin generated during formulation of 
2,4,5-T. While the two herbicides break down in the environment 
rather quickly, dioxin is a highly persistent compound that 
remains in the environment for decades and can cause cancer, 
birth defects and other health and developmental problems. 

The Hatfield study, one of the most comprehensive conducted on 
Agent Orange to date, found high levels of dioxin in the blood of 
Vietnamese born after the war, indicating that contaminants are 
being transferred through the food chain. High levels of dioxin 
were also found in fish and animal tissue. The study did not 
determine the number of people affected, and the authors stated 
that epidemiological studies are needed to establish a direct 
link between Agent Orange and the high rate of birth deformities 
found among the populations studied. 

The report recommended setting up a public health plan to ensure 
that people do not eat contaminated food; comprehensive studies 
to investigate the link between Agent Orange and health problems; 
international assistance to develop and implement a reforestation 
program; and a campaign to decontaminate affected lands. 

Since the war, Vietnam has not asked for compensation, but 
according to Hatfield needs help from the international community 
to reclaim denuded forest lands. Large areas of land that were 
once jungle are now covered with scrub and wild grasses and could 

take centuries to recover without human intervention. Vietnam 
also needs assistance to care for the 70,000 people who the 
government says have medical or physical problems caused by their 
exposure or their parents' exposure to Agent Orange. 

Effects of Agent Orange on U.S. veterans who were in Vietnam has 
also been studied. However, according to a six-month 
investigation by The San Diego Union-Tribune, the U.S. military's 
US$200 million study is so flawed that it might be useless. After 
interviewing military scientists and reviewing meeting 
transcripts, government reports and internal memos, the newspaper 
uncovered a series of flaws in the Air Force study which began in 
1979 and ends in 2006. 

Problems with the study include: 
-- Two reports revealing serious birth defects among children of 
veterans exposed to Agent Orange were withheld for years; 
-- A report stating concerns about cancer and birth defects was 
altered making the risks appear less serious; 
-- The government ignored a National Academy of Sciences 
recommendation that the study be conducted by scientists outside 
the military; 
-- High ranking Air Force officers interfered with the study's 
data analysis undermining its scientific integrity. 

The San Diego Union-Tribune quoted one of the scientists, who 
designed the study but was later removed from the investigation, 
as saying it was a medical crime. He also stated that the study 
was manipulated to downplay the health problems of Vietnam 
veterans. The newspaper reports that the study's findings to date 
have been a key factor in denying compensation to Vietnam 
veterans who have illnesses they claim are related to Agent 
Orange exposure. 

Sources: "Vietnam Study Finds Dioxin in Food Chain," Los Angeles 
Times, October 31, 1998. "How the Military Misled Vietnam 
Veterans and Their Families About the Health Risks of Agent 
Orange," The San Diego Union-Tribune, November 1, 1998. Hatfield 
Consultants Ltd., www.hatfieldgroup.com. 
Contact: PANNA. 

Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) 
49 Powell St., Suite 500, San Francisco, California 94102 
Phone (415) 981-1771 
Fax (415) 981-1991 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
web site www.panna.org/panna/ 

To subscribe to PANUPS, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the 
following text on one line: subscribe panups 
To unsubscribe send the following: unsubscribe panups 

** End of text from cdp:headlines **

-- 
Back To The Blanket Journal: 

http://www.angelfire.com/biz/BackToTheBlanket 

Heroine Mu Gui-Ying 

http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Pagoda/7111 
  


          &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment
...http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
          &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
Unenh onhwa' Awayaton

http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
                     `"`    `"`    `"`  `"`    `"`    `"`
                             

Reply via email to