And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 16:02:07 -0600 (CST)
>From: "Progressive Resource/Action Coop." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: WHITE HOUSE ILLINIWAK COMPLAINT 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>>From: "Boyle, Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>December 14, 1998
>>
>>Interagency Working Group on Human Rights Treaties c/o Mr. Samuel Berger
>>Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs The White House
>>Washington, D.C.  20504 FAX:202-456-2461 BY FAX AND MAIL
>>
>>COMPLAINT AGAINST THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOR VIOLATING THE CONVENTION
>>ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (CERD)
>>
>>Dear Mr. Berger:
>>
>>        I have read President Clinton's Executive Order of December 10,
>>1998 on the Implementation of Human Rights Treaties.  Pursuant thereto,
>>you have been put in charge of organizing the Interagency Working Group on
>>Human Rights Treaties.  One of the "principal functions of the Interagency
>>Working Group shall include:  ... (v) developing recommended proposals and
>>mechanisms for improving the monitoring of the actions by the various
>>States, Commonwealths, and territories of the United States ... including
>>the review of State, Commonwealth and territorial laws for their
>>conformity with relevant treaties, the provision of relevant information
>>for reports and other monitoring purposes, and the promotion of effective
>>remedial mechanisms ..."  Section 1 of President Clinton's Executive Order
>>states: "(a) It shall be the policy and practice of the Government of the
>>United States, being committed to the protection and promotion of human
>>rights and fundamental freedoms, fully to respect and implement its
>>obligations under the international human rights treaties to which it is a
>>party, including ... the CERD."
>>
>>        Pursuant to this pathbreaking Executive Order by President
>>Clinton, I hereby file the first Complaint before your Interagency Working
>>Group against the University of Illinois, an instrumentality of the State
>>of Illinois, for violating the CERD because of its abuse, degradation, and
>>exploitation of a Native American as the mascot for its sports teams and
>>for the quite mercenary and venal purpose of raising over $1 billion from
>>its alumni.  In support of this Complaint, attached you will find a signed
>>Memorandum of Law by me entitled Illiniwak:  Racial Discrimination! dated
>>25 July 1997, that was sent to the Board of Trustees of the University of
>>Illinois.  This Memorandum details at great length precisely how the
>>University of Illinois' Chief Illiniwak violates the CERD.  I hereby
>>incorporate this Memorandum as an integral part of this Complaint.  I
>>hereby repeat, reaffirm, and reallege each and every statement of fact and
>>conclusion of law set forth in my Memorandum.
>>
>>        In addition to grossly violating the CERD, the University of
>>Illinois' Chief Illiniwak has inflicted grave, immediate, and irreparable
>>harm upon the Native American Students, Faculty, and Staff here at the
>>University of Illinois:    threats, insults, bullying, harassment,

>>intimidation, and outright terrorization.  For these reasons, I ask you
>>and the Interagency Working Group to secure the immediate termination of
>>Chief Illiniwak in order to bring the University of Illinois and the State
>>of Illinois into compliance with the CERD.
>>
>>                                   Yours very truly,
>>
>>                                   Francis A. Boyle                
>>                   Professor of Law                                   
>>Board of Directors                                    Amnesty
>>International USA                                    (1988-1992)
>>
>>Attachment
>>
>>ILLINIWAK: RACIAL DISCRIMINATION!
>>
>>by
>>
>>Francis A. Boyle
>>
>>Professor of Law
>>
>>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>>
>>Board of Directors, Amnesty International USA (1988-92)
>>
>>Holder of 2 Football Season Tickets (Since About 1981)
>>
>>Holder of 2 Basketball Season Tickets (Since About 1982)
>>
>>        In his letter of 16 July 1997 to Ms. Susan Gravenhorst, Chair of
>>the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Professor Mort
>>Winston, Chair of the Board of Directors of Amnesty International USA
>>(AIUSA) and a prominent University of Illinois Alumnus, called "Chief"
>>Illiniwak a "human rights violation," condemned it in no uncertain terms,
>>and demanded the elimination of this racist mascot.  Before he joined the
>>AIUSA Board, Professor Winston was the leading AIUSA expert on, and
>>activist against, racism and apartheid in South Africa prior to the
>>Mandela revolution.  Professor Winston knows a human rights violation when
>>he sees one.
>>
>>        The same is true for me.  In addition to serving four years as a
>>Member of the Board of Directors of Amnesty International USA, I was the
>>person who single-handedly convinced the ultra-conservative Faculty of the
>>University of Illinois College of Law to introduce a course on
>>International Human Rights Law into the Law School Curriculum as Law 370,
>>and have taught this course for many years to about 30 students per year. 
>>Illiniwak is indeed a human rights violation.
>>
>>        The United States government is a contracting party to the 1965
>>International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
>>Discrimination.  Hence, this Racial Discrimination Convention is a
>>"treaty' and thus the "supreme Law of the Land" under the so-called
>>Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the United States Constitution:
>>
>>Article VI
>>
>>        ....
>>
>>
>>
>>        This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall
>>be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be
>>made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law
>>of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any
>>Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
>>notwithstanding.
>>
>>
>>
>>In other words, the Racial Discrimination Convention absolutely binds the
>>entirety of the State of Illinois, including therein the University of
>>Illinois.
>>
>>        Article 1(1) of the Racial Discrimination Convention defines the
>>term "racial discrimination" as follows:  "In this Convention the term

>>'racial discrimination' shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction
>>or preference based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin
>>which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the
>>recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights
>>and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or
>>any other field of public life."  (Emphasis added.)  Obviously, Illiniwak
>>is a "distinction" on the multiple bases of "race," and "colour," and
>>"descent."  Illiniwak definitely has the "effect of nullifying or
>>impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of
>>human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social,
>>cultural or any other field of public life" for Native American Students,
>>Faculty, Staff and Community Members here at the University of Illinois in
>>Urbana-Champaign.  In accordance with the terms of this Racial
>>Discrimination Convention to which the United States is a party, Illiniwak
>>constitutes "racial discrimination" by the University of Illinois against
>>Native Americans.
>>
>>        Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Racial Discrimination Convention
>>provides as follows:
>>Article 2
>>
>>
>>
>>        1.  States Parties condemn racial discrimination and undertake to
>>pursue by all appropriate means and without delay a policy of eliminating
>>racial discrimination in all its forms, and promoting understanding among
>>all races, and to this end:
>>
>>
>>
>>        (a)  Each State Party undertakes to engage in no act or practice
>>of racial discrimination against persons, groups of persons or
>>institutions and to ensure that all public authorities and public
>>institutions, national and local, shall act in conformity with this
>>obligation;
>>
>>        (b)  Each State Party undertakes not to sponsor, defend or support
>>racial discrimination by any persons or organizations;
>>
>>        (c)  Each State Party shall take effective measures to review
>>governmental, national and local policies, and to amend, rescind or
>>nullify any laws and regulations which have the effect of creating or
>>perpetuating racial discrimination wherever it exists;
>>
>>        (d)  Each State Party shall prohibit and bring to an end, by all
>>appropriate means, including legislation as required by circumstances,
>>racial discrimination by any persons, group or organization;
>>
>>        (e)  Each State Party undertakes to encourage, where appropriate,
>>integrationist multi-racial organizations and movements and other means of
>>eliminating barriers between races, and to discourage anything which tends
>>to strengthen racial division.  [Emphasis added.]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Clearly, Illiniwak places the United States of America in breach of these
>>most solemn obligations under Article 2 of the Racial Discrimination
>>Convention.  Illiniwak contravenes Racial Discrimination Convention
>>Article 2.  The conclusion is inexorable that to be in accordance with the
>>terms of the Racial Discrimination Convention, the University of Illinois
>>must eliminate Illiniwak.

>>
>>        Article 4 of the Racial Discrimination Convention clearly requires
>>the Government of the United States of America to eliminate Illiniwak in
>>no uncertain terms:
>>
>>Article 4
>>
>>
>>
>>        States Parties condemn all propaganda and all organizations which
>>are based on ideas or theories of superiority of one race or group of
>>persons of one colour or ethnic origin, or which attempt to justify or
>>promote racial hatred and discrimination in any form, and undertake to
>>adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement
>>to, or acts of, such discrimination, and to this end, with due regard to
>>the principles embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
>>the rights expressly set forth in article 5 of this Convention, inter alia:
>>
>>        (a)  Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination
>>of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial
>>discrimination, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts
>>against any race or group of persons of another colour or ethnic origin,
>>and also the provision of any assistance to racist activities, including
>>the financing thereof;
>>
>>        (b)  Shall declare illegal and prohibit organizations, and also
>>organized and all other propaganda activities, which promote and incite
>>racial discrimination, and shall recognize participation in such
>>organizations or activities as an offence punishable by law;
>>
>>        (c)  Shall not permit public authorities or public institutions,
>>national or local, to promote or incite racial discrimination.  [Emphasis
>>added.]
>>
>>
>>
>>        Notice in particular the requirement of Article 4(c) of the Racial
>>Discrimination Convention:  "Shall not permit public authorities or public
>>institutions, national or local, to promote or incite racial
>>discrimination."  To the contrary, the University of Illinois deliberately
>>promotes and incites racial discrimination against Native Americans by
>>means of Illiniwak for the quite mercenary purpose of making money!
>>
>>        Article 5 of the Racial Discrimination Convention expressly
>>requires the United States government "to prohibit and to eliminate racial
>>discrimination in all its forms and to guarantee the right of everyone,
>>without distinction as to race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, to
>>equality before the law, notably in the enjoyment of the following
>>rights..."  (Emphasis added.)  The conclusion is inexorable that Illiniwak
>>contravenes Article 5 of the Racial Discrimination Convention.
>>
>>        Furthermore, Illiniwak also contravenes Article 6 of the Racial
>>Discrimination Convention:
>>Article 6
>>
>>
>>
>>        States Parties shall assure to everyone within their jurisdiction
>>effective protection and remedies through the competent national tribunals
>>and other State institutions against any acts of racial discrimination
>>which violate his human rights and fundamental freedoms contrary to this
>>Convention, as well as the right to seek from such tribunals just and
>>adequate reparation or satisfaction for any damage suffered as a result of

>>such discrimination.
>>
>>
>>
>>        Finally, Illiniwak contravenes Article 7 of the Racial
>>Discrimination Convention:
>>Article 7
>>
>>
>>
>>        States Parties undertake to adopt immediate and effective
>>measures, particularly in the fields of teaching, education, culture and
>>information, with a view to combating prejudices which lead to racial
>>discrimination and to promoting understanding, tolerance and friendship
>>among nations and racial or ethnical groups, as well as to propagating the
>>purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the
>>Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Declaration on
>>the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and this Convention.
>>
>>
>>
>>The conclusion is inexorable that to be in accordance with the terms of
>>the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
>>Discrimination the University of Illinois--a Public Institution--must
>>eliminate Illiniwak.
>>
>>        As can be seen from the above analysis, the International
>>Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
>>expressly incorporates by reference the 1948 Universal Declaration of
>>Human Rights (UDHR).  No point would be served here by detailing all the
>>provisions of the UDHR that are currently being violated by Illiniwak. 
>>But in particular, I wish to draw to your attention UDHR Articles 1 and 2:
>>
>>Article 1
>>
>>
>>
>>        All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. 
>>They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one
>>another in a spirit of brotherhood.
>>
>>
>>
>>Article 2
>>
>>
>>
>>        Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in
>>this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour,
>>sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social
>>origin, property, birth or other status.  (Emphasis added.)
>>
>>
>>
>>        The United States government has been in the vanguard of the
>>worldwide movement to establish that these fundamental provisions of the
>>Universal Declaration of Human Rights, inter alia, constitute customary
>>international law.  Customary international law is part of the common law
>>of the United States of America and the common law of all the States of
>>the Union.  Customary international law applies to and binds the State of
>>Illinois and the University of Illinois.
>>
>>        Clearly, by means of Illiniwak the University of Illinois refuses
>>to act towards Native Americans "in a spirit of brotherhood" in violation
>>of UDHR Article 1.  Similarly, Illiniwak constitutes a "distinction" on
>>the prohibited grounds of race, colour and religion, inter alia, in gross
>>violation of UDHR Article 2.  In other words, Illiniwak violates these
>>most fundamental protections of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
>>inter alia, and thus violates customary international law and therefore
>>the common law of both the United States and the State of Illinois.
>>
>>        I wish to end this Memorandum by joining those eloquent and
>>powerful words addressed to Trustee Susan Gravenhorst by Professor Mort

>>Winston, Chair of the Board of Directors of Amnesty International, my
>>fellow AIUSA Board Colleague and Comrade-in-Arms in the long but
>>successful struggle against racism and apartheid in South Africa:
>>
>>
>>
>>In your present position as Chair of the Board of Trustees, you can steer
>>university policy on this issue towards the greater good.  I urge you to
>>do so.  UIUC's sport's fans and the marching band can find another
>>mascot.  Have a contest.  Pick an animal or some culturally neutral
>>symbol.  Show some moral leadership so that perhaps the professional
>>sports teams that also dishonor American Indians by debasing their
>>cultural symbols will one day follow suit.  But above all stop pretending
>>that keeping "Chief Illiniwek" alive is somehow "honoring" the Native
>>Americans who once roamed the plains where the University of Illinois now
>>stands.  In short, "Do the Right Thing -- Get Rid of the Chief!"
>>
>>
>>
>>F.A.B.
>>
>>25 July 1997
>>
>><File:Chief  TARGET="_blank">File:Chief Illiniwak, Complaint to Berger.wpd
>>
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Visit the anti-"Chief" webpage at http://www.prairienet.org/prc
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

          &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment
...http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
          &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
Unenh onhwa' Awayaton

http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
                     `"`    `"`    `"`  `"`    `"`    `"`
                             

Reply via email to