And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 02:58:10 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RAND Article on Tribes:  Recognized and Not Federally
  Recognized


http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR630.html

Native American Affairs and the Department of Defense
Donald Mitchell, David Rubenson
Copyright � 1995 RAND 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preface

This report reviews the implications for the Department of Defense of
recent statutes and regulations affecting Native Americans, growing
political awareness and activism, and the U.S. Army's historical role in
Indian affairs. The report is part of a larger study being conducted for
the Principal Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental
Security) on conservation policy as it relates to the Department of
Defense's natural and cultural resource program.

It should be of interest to those charged with responsibility for the
natural and cultural resource program as well as to those concerned with
Native American affairs and federal land management. The project was
conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of RAND's
National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and
development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the
defense agencies, and the Joint Staff.

Donald Mitchell is an attorney in Anchorage, Alaska, and a consultant to
RAND. He is the former chief counsel for the Alaska Federation of Natives
and is currently writing a book on the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

Summary

The President's April 29, 1994 Memorandum

On April 29, 1994, President and Mrs. Clinton, Vice President and Mrs.
Gore, and every member of the President's cabinet (other than the Secretary
of State) met with more than 300 Native American[1] leaders of "federally
recognized Indian tribes" on the south lawn of the White House. It was the
first time in the nation's history that a President of the United States
had held such a meeting.

During the meeting, the President signed a memorandum directing the heads
of all executive branch departments and agencies to 

�"operate within a government-to-government relationship with federally
recognized tribal governments"

�"consult, to the greatest extent practicable and to the extent permitted
by law, with tribal governments prior to taking actions that affect
federally recognized tribal governments" 

�"assess the impact of federal government plans, projects, programs, and
activities on tribal trust resources and assure that tribal government
rights and concerns are considered during the development of such plans,
projects, programs, and activities."[2]

Implications of the President's Memorandum for DoD

The Department of Defense (DoD) has a comprehensive natural and cultural
resource program that incorporates a wide range of responsibilities that
Congress, the President, and sometimes the states have assigned to DoD for
the protection of natural and cultural resources on DoD agency-managed land.


The directives contained in the President's April 29, 1994 memorandum are
to be carried out within DoD's natural and cultural resources program and
are only some of many binding requirements. The way in which the above
directives are implemented in the field may vary with such factors as the
competing demands imposed by other natural and cultural resource
obligations, the individual personalities of DoD installation commanders,
the continual rotation of assignments, the DoD land managers' understanding
of the reasons the President issued his April 29, 1994 memorandum, and the
extent to which it is recognized that vigorous implementation of the
memorandum will materially advance DoD's achievement of its natural and
cultural resources protection obligations.

It is thus critical for DoD personnel--at many levels of organization--to
gain a better understanding of the implications of the President's
memorandum for the Department. To give installation commanders and land
managers a better understanding of the historical and political
circumstances that motivated the President to issue his memorandum, we
attempt to answer the following questions: 

1.Does the President's April 29, 1994 memorandum reflect a change in
Congress or the federal executive branch's political relationship with
Native Americans and federally recognized Indian tribes? If so, the DoD
agencies should be aware of it.

2.Other than the President's directive that they do so, what reasons does
DoD have to implement the April 29, 1994 memorandum? 

3.What is the nature of the statutes that require DoD agencies to preserve
Native American cultural resources and to involve Native Americans
generally--and representatives of "federally recognized Indian tribes"
particularly--in DoD agency decisionmaking?

4.How should the DoD agencies interact with Native American groups that are
not federally recognized tribes? 

A Changing Relationship

Our central observation is that the President's April 29, 1994 meeting with
the leaders of the nation's federally recognized Indian tribes symbolizes
the growing ability of Native American leaders to influence the development
and implementation of federal policies that affect their indigenous
constituencies.

During the latter half of the 19th and the first half of the 20th
centuries, non-Native American representatives of white "friends of the
Indian" organizations were the most influential spokespersons for Native
Americans on Capitol Hill and inside the executive branch of the federal
government. However, in the 1960s a new generation of Native American
leaders emerged who over the past three decades have gained increasing
skill in articulating Native American concerns and in influencing the
development and implementation of Native American-related congressional and
executive branch policies.

Of coequal importance, since 1969 an expanding public interest in Native
Americans and their problems has facilitated the ability of Native American
leaders to participate in the development and implementation of Native
American-related congressional and executive branch policies, and has
assisted Native American leaders in developing bipartisan support for

Native American programs and policies in the Congress. 

We have included two case studies--one from Idaho and another from
Alaska--to illustrate the challenges that implementation of federal Native
American-related policies can present for DoD installation commanders and
land managers in the field. The studies show that morally compelling
concerns of Native Americans can be combined with the organizational
capability of environmental activists and others to create a political
synergy of considerable consequence to the attainment of DoD land
management objectives.

Treaties and Statutes

Through its ratification of treaties and enactment of statutes, Congress
has imposed numerous Native American-related obligations on DoD agencies.
Many of those obligations are similar in their legal structure to those
implied by certain natural resource protection laws. They emphasize
planning and self-enforcement, and have indirect--though potentially
binding--mechanisms of enforcement. 

This report reviews the major statutes that require DoD installation
commanders and land managers to address Native American concerns, and
demonstrates how implementation of the directives contained in the
President's April 29, 1994 memorandum can materially advance DoD agency
implementation of Native American-related treaty and statutory obligations.

Historical Considerations

DoD agencies and Native Americans share a common belief in the importance
of history. Two components of DoD agencies' past involvement with Native
Americans can facilitate DoD installation commanders' and land managers'
understanding of the President's policy objectives as well as their
understanding of the motivations of Native American leaders. 

The first component is the unusually large number of Native Americans (as a
percentage of the Native American population) who have served in the armed
services, which we believe establishes a compelling justification for DoD
installation commanders and land managers to vigorously implement the
President's memorandum.

The second component is the United States Army's participation in
implementing Congress' Indian policies during the 18th and 19th centuries.
We discuss the common elements of that history, recognizing that each
federally recognized Indian tribe and each Native American group that has
not been federally recognized has its own history of involvement with the
federal government during the 18th and 19th centuries. DoD installation
commanders and land managers who interact with representatives of a
particular tribe or Native American group should be aware of the role
history may play in the current perspectives of that particular tribe.

Tribes Not Federally Recognized 

One of the greatest challenges DoD officials will face in implementing the
President's directive is to arrive at an approach for interacting with
Native American groups that are not federally recognized tribes.

Because the memorandum directs DoD to "operate within a
government-to-government relationship with federally recognized tribal
governments" and to "consult . . . with tribal governments," the threshold
challenge is to identify Native American groups that are "federally

recognized Indian tribes."

The second major challenge is to develop a policy for dealing with and
consulting Native American groups that are not federally recognized Indian
tribes but with which statutes such as the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
require DoD agencies to interact. The development and implementation of
such a policy are particularly important with respect to DoD agency
relations with Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians, whose history of
involvement with the United States government is different from that of
Native Americans who reside in the coterminous states.

We conclude this discussion with a case study from Camp Pendleton,
California, that illustrates the importance of having a policy for
interacting with Native American groups that are not federally recognized
Indian tribes.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Our general argument is that the importance of Native American affairs to
the Department of Defense is growing. Just as environmental affairs became
a major DoD concern in the late 1980s, a number of factors signal the need
to pay increased attention to Native American affairs in the next decade.
The DoD should interpret the President's meeting on the White House lawn as
symbolic of this.

We argue that the questions posed above should be answered in the following
way. 

1.The President's directive reflects the growing ability of Native American
groups to access the political process and ensure that their interests are
represented in legislation. Although there seems to be no congressional
interest in financing a broad-based program to remedy the problems of
Indian life in America, this increased political influence can result in
legislation that has important implications for DoD facilities.

2.The President's directive provides an overarching strategy for addressing
diverse and sometimes unpredictable issues that can affect DoD interests
and goals. These diverse issues include the potential for Native American
claims to affect DoD land-use goals (particularly when the moral strength
of these claims is combined with the organizational capability of
environmental groups and other well-organized users of the public lands),
the potential for some to assert that the Army's historical role implies
special obligations for the DoD, and the need to fulfill a variety of
statutes related to Native American affairs. 

3.A number of statutes obligate DoD to protect Native American artifacts,
religious sites, and historic monuments. As with natural resource laws,
these laws are far less prescriptive than environmental laws and require a
degree of planning and self-enforcement. This implies that they may have
low priority in DoD's natural and cultural resource program. However, the
political effectiveness discussed above suggests that there may be
increased use of these laws by Native Americans and other advocacy groups
when seeking to modify federal agency activity. The President's directive
provides a general approach to addressing the combined legal, political,
and historical aspects of Native American affairs.


4.Although federal recognition is the first test for determining whether
consultation is required, there are many unrecognized tribes for which
consultation would be in DoD's self-interest. Many statutes already contain
obligations to tribes beyond those that are federally recognized. DoD will
need to develop tools that facilitate a better understanding of which
nonrecognized tribes have legitimate claims and which do not. DoD must be
particularly sensitive to these issues in Alaska and Hawaii. 

To respond to these general observations, we recommend that the following
actions be taken to implement the President's April 29, 1994 memorandum and
to improve DoD's working relationship with Native Americans: 

�DoD and the services should develop a written policy to guide DoD
installation commanders' and land managers' implementation of the
President's memorandum. In particular, the policy should instruct DoD
installation commanders and land managers to inform the leaders of local
federally recognized Indian tribes of their commitment to working with such
tribes on a "government-to-government" basis. The policy should recognize
that some non-federally recognized tribes should receive the same commitment.

�To begin developing capabilities for determing which nonrecognized tribes
have valid claims, histories and maps of prior Native American use of DoD
agency-administered land should be made available. Such maps and histories
should be useful in preparing for consultations with recognized tribes and
in implementing relevant statutes. 

�DoD installations should designate a coordinator for Native American
affairs to help retain institutional memory and policy expertise.
Currently, installations typically rely on the staff archaeologist, who may
not have the inclination and training to probe into the policy aspects of
Native American affairs.

�DoD should communicate its intention to develop and implement the policies
described in the first two bullets above in a highly visible and
politically symbolic manner. In 1944, leaders of thirty federally
recognized Indian tribes organized the National Congress of American
Indians (NCAI). Today, NCAI is recognized by Native Americans as the
spokesorganization for all of the nation's federally recognized tribes.
NCAI holds an annual national convention. At the 1994 convention, Vice
President Gore delivered the keynote address, during which he reaffirmed
the President's commitment "to working diligently and respectfully to help
American Indians control their destiny, and to preserve the land of their
ancestors." The Secretary of Defense or other high-ranking DoD official
should consider addressing a future NCAI convention to convey DoD's
commitment to implementing the President's April 29, 1994 memorandum and to
communicate DoD's intention to develop and implement the policies. 

�In consultation with federally recognized Indian tribes and other
appropriate Native American groups, the Army historian or a panel of
military historians should develop materials that will enable DoD personnel
to understand and to respond to questions from both the Native American

community and the public regarding the Army's historical role in
implementing Congress' 18th and 19th century Indian policies.

In summary, DoD should expect that Native American affairs will be of
growing importance to the department, changing from the need to meet a few
loosely enforced statutes to a larger awareness involving core DoD
interests and goals. DoD will need to develop new capabilities and an
increased level of organizational attention. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1]The term Native American means citizens of the United States who are of
American Indian, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian ancestry. Some Native
Americans are members of federally recognized Indian tribes, and others are
not. Congress has enacted statutes that benefit Native Americans generally
and other statutes that benefit specific groups of Native
Americans--members of federally recognized Indian tribes, Alaska Natives
and so forth.

[2]Office of the White House, Memorandum: "Government-to-Government
Relations with Native American Tribal Governments," April 29, 1994.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents

Chapter One:Introduction

Chapter Two:The Political Context

Overview
Native American Political Activism
The Legislative Climate
The Impact on DoD Agency Land Management

Chapter Three:Historical Considerations

Overview
History of Native American Service in the Armed Forces
The Army's Historical Role
Chapter Four:Treaties and Major Statutes

Overview
Treaties
Statutes

Chapter Five: Native American Groups Other than Federally Recognized Tribes

Overview
Federal Recognition
Alaska Natives
Native Hawaiians
Case Study: Nonrecognized Tribe at Camp Pendleton

Chapter Six: Conclusions and Recommendations

Appendix 

Bibliography


           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to