And now:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S.I.S.I.S.) writes: GINOOGAMING NATION (LONG LAKE #58) SEEKS DECLARATION FROM ONTARIO COURT ONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION) BETWEEN Ginoogaming Nation (Long Lake #58] - Plaintiff and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario - Defendants CLAIM 1. The plaintiff claims a declaration (1) acknowledging its remedy of independent and impartial third-party adjudication (2) 2. The plaintiff is a "Nation or Tribe of Indians" whose territory, the Long Lake drainage basin north of Lake Superior, not having been "ceded to or purchased by Us" is by operation of constitutional law "reserved" for Indians (3) 3. Relative to the said territory the defendants'governments and courts prematurely assume "plenum dominium" (4) (plenary jurisdiction) over and above the jurisdiction to purchase, thereby breaching the constitutional law injunction that Indians "should not be molested or disturbed "(5) pending purchase. 4. By operation of constitutional law the said molestation and disturbance prima facie constitutes "Misprision of Treason and Fraud" (6). In addition, a continuing consequence of the said crimes in "serious bodily or mental harm" against the constituents of the plaintiff for which the public officials and judges of the defendants' governments and courts arguably are liable, if it continues, to prosecution for "Complicity in Genocide." (7) 5. All of which places the defendants' governments and courts in an inherent and profound conflict of interest. 6. In sum the Indian "Interest" "subject to" (8) which the crown holds title at constitutional law is being prejudiced by the premature application by the defendants' governments and courts of federal and provincial law. The plaintiff proposes that this action be tried at Ottawa, Ontario Dated at Longlac, Ontario, this 13th day of February, 1999, by counsel for the plaintiffs, Bruce Clark. GINOOGAMING NATION (LONG LAKE #58) per: [signed by] Elders, Family Territory Head Persons TO: Registrar AND TO: Defendants by their Attorneys General Footnotes: (1) Courts of Justice Act, section 97. Delgamuukw v. AGBC, September 12, 1995 transcript in SCC on a motion. <http://kafka.uvic.ca/~vipirg/SISIS/Clark/sep12scc.html> (2) Mohegan Indians v. Connecticut, 1704. <http://kafka.uvic.ca/~vipirg/SISIS/Clark/oic1704.html> Joseph H. Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations. 1950. pp. 417-25, 461-63. (3) Royal Proclamation of 1763. <http://www.bloorstreet.com/200block/rp1763.htm> (4) St. Catherines Milling & Lumber Co. Ltd, v. The Queen (1888), 14 AC 46, 60 (JCPC). (5) Royal Proclamation of 1763. (6) Royal Proclamation of 1763. (7) Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948, articles 2(b), 3(e), 4 and 6. <http://www.tufts.edu/departments/fletcher/multi/texts/BH225.txt> (8) Constitution Act, 1867, section 109. <http://insight.mcmaster.ca/org/efc/pages/law/cons/Constitutions/Canada/Eng lish/ca_1867.html>. St. Catherines Milling & Lumber Co. Ltd. v The Queen (1888), 14 AC 46, 53-55 (JCPC). AG Ont. v AG Can. [1897] AC 199, 205, 210-11 (JCPC). :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: S.I.S.I.S. Settlers In Support of Indigenous Sovereignty P.O. Box 8673, Victoria, "B.C." "Canada" V8X 3S2 EMAIL : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://kafka.uvic.ca/~vipirg/SISIS/SISmain.html SOVERNET-L is a news-only listserv concerned with indigenous sovereigntist struggles around the world. To subscribe, send "subscribe sovernet-l" in the body of an email message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For more information on sovernet-l, contact S.I.S.I.S. :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
