And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 01:08:47 EST
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: California Senator Burton sees no forest through the Pacific
Lumber trees
>
>
>Pacific Lumber Deal Imperiled
>Safeguards sought by Sen. Burton 
>Greg Lucas, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
>Thursday, December 17, 1998 
>�1998 San Francisco Chronicle 
>
>URL: 
>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1998/1
>2/17/MN91948.DTL 
>
>The leader of the California Senate threatened yesterday to rescind the 
>state's share of a $495 million deal to buy a Headwaters Forest redwood 
>grove unless Pacific Lumber Co. agrees to stronger protections for 
>endangered species on their timberlands. 
>
>The threat by Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, D-San Francisco, 
>raises the ante in negotiations between the lumber company and federal 
>officials over the scope of the company's habitat conservation plan, 
>which will govern logging practices on Pacific Lumber's 190,000 acres. 
>
>``We put this money in to save the trees and to save the fish,'' Burton 
>told reporters. ``If we don't get our money's worth, we are not going to 
>pay the money.'' 
>
>Burton said the introduction of legislation to withdraw the state's 
>share, about $245 million, is ``a distinct possibility.'' 
>
>The agreement to purchase a 3,500-acre grove of old growth redwoods in 
>the Headwaters Forest and more than 5,000 additional acres of timberland 
>owned by Pacific Lumber was the last act of the Legislature this year. 
>
>Six weeks after the deal was struck, the state suspended the company's 
>logging license, citing 128 violations of state forestry regulations 
>over the past three years. 
>
>The purchase of the groves within the Headwaters Forest is contingent on 
>the company adopting a variety of protections for endangered fish and 
>birds like the coho salmon and the marbled murrelet, which inhabit 
>company land. 
>
>Those protections are to be included in the conservation plan, which 
>will regulate logging of Pacific Lumber's holdings for the next 50 
>years. 
>
>The plan is in draft form and must be completed before March 1, the 
>deadline for spending the $250 million in federal money set aside for 
>the Headwaters purchase. 
>
>``We need to wrap this up as soon as possible,'' said Tim Ahern, a 
>spokesman for the U.S. Department of the Interior. To meet the March 1 
>deadline, Ahern said, talks with Pacific Lumber need to be completed 
>``by the end of this week.'' 
>
>Some environmentalists were critical of the restrictions imposed by the 
>state as part of its purchase agreement. In particular, they said, a 
>prohibition on logging within 100 feet of any fish-bearing streams is 
>not strong enough, arguing that the no-cut zones should be broader. 
>
>The talks with the company center on the desire of federal officials to 
>add further restrictions, including 30-foot, no-cut zones on both sides 
>of streams that run only during the rainy season. 
>
>They also want the cutting of larger trees phased in over the life of 
>the conservation plan to provide more habitat for marbled murrelets over 

>the next few years. 
>
>Sources said the company opposes the new restrictions, insisting it will 
>bankrupt them by taking away an additional 100,000 acres of their 
>logging lands. 
>
>But Pacific Lumber spokeswoman Mary Bullwinkel, said, ``We don't have a 
>comment at this time on what the federal government is asking. As for 
>Senator Burton, I was not aware of his intentions. I'm sure we'll have 
>to take a look at that.'' 
>
>One of the timber company's allies in resisting the additional federal 
>restrictions is Doug Wheeler, Governor Pete Wilson's Cabinet secretary 
>for resources. 
>
>Wheeler said yesterday that imposing more limits on the company is 
>unnecessary and that the plan's current restrictions meet federal law. 
>
>``I think it is unfortunate Senator Burton would choose this moment to 
>undercut the most significant conservation initiative currently under 
>way in California,'' Wheeler said. 
>
>Burton accused Wheeler yesterday of shilling for Pacific Lumber and 
>suggested that Wheeler ``butt out'' of the negotiations. If Wheeler 
>``wants to work for (the company) I'm sure they'll give him a good job 
>for services rendered,' Burton said. 
>
>
>
>�1998 San Francisco Chronicle
> 

Reply via email to