And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 13:06:26 EST
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [DOEWatch] States get together to protect Smokies ----
Ozone-----SNS----power usage
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Source:
><A HREF="http://www.oakridger.com/stories/122398/stt_1223980005.html">
>http://www.oakridger.com/stories/122398/stt_1223980005.html
>========================================================
>December 23, 1998
>
>States get together to protect Smokies 
>
>by Paul Nowell 
>Associated Press 
>
>   CHARLOTTE -- North Carolina has signed an agreement that Tennessee and the
>federal government reached earlier to protect Great Smoky Mountains National
>Park from industrial pollution.
>   Tuesday's announcement came as a Dec. 31 deadline for the air quality
>accord's expiration was approaching. If another state did not sign the
>agreement by the end of the year, it would have been nullified.
>   "The agreement is an important step toward protecting air quality in North
>Carolina's most pristine areas, from the Great Smoky Mountains to the coast,"
>said Wayne McDevitt, secretary of the North Carolina Department of
Environment
>and Natural Resources, who signed the document on Gov. Jim Hunt's behalf.
>   The agreement, or memorandum of understanding, now takes effect March
1. It
>also includes a sunset clause that calls for the pact to expire if at least
>one other Southeastern state does not sign it by the end of 2000.
>   Tennessee had signed on last year to the agreement with the U.S.
Department
>of Interior, after a compromise with business interests was reached.
>   The national park is suffering from high levels of ozone and other air
>pollutants. The pact calls for early notification if an air-polluting
industry
>wants to locate or expand near the park or other protected areas.
>   In October, some 200 people showed up at the hearing at the University of
>North Carolina at Asheville to listen to officials from both states as
well as
>the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service.
>   Several speakers complained about personal property rights or suggested
>that such a pact would put the two states at a competitive disadvantage
>against other Southeastern states in the high-stakes game of industrial
>recruiting.
>   Despite some opposition, most of the speakers urged North Carolina
>officials to sign the agreement.
>   The proposal would give federal agencies a clearer role in reviewing the
>impact of large new or expanding industries on the mountains and wilderness
>areas. Federal law gives national parks and wildernesses of more than 5,000
>acres special protection.
>   This summer record ozone levels were recorded in the North Carolina
>mountains, and manmade haze obscured visibility in the national park.
>   According to Jim Renfro, the park's air resource specialist, haze has cut
>the average visibility at the park from 93 miles to 22. Acid rain has tainted
>mountain streams, and high ozone levels are causing leaves on some 30 plant
>species to turn yellow or fall off.
>   The smog also causes breathing problems in people. On 43 days this summer,
>the air exceeded the federal health standard.

>   The proposed agreement explains what information federal agencies can
>require from industries and on what timetable.
>   Industry groups have been fighting the proposed agreement. They say it
does
>not set clear standards and could cost extra time and money to satisfy the
>federal agencies.
>   "Here at the 11th hour, we have a rush to judgment," Ed Scott of North
>Carolina Citizens for Business and Industry said prior to Tuesday's
>announcement.
>   "We are being perceived as evil and the business community is very
>frustrated," he said. "We don't feel like we had a fair hearing."
>   Scott said his organization's stance is that North Carolina should have
>waited until after the Governor's Summit on Mountain Air Quality next
April in
>Asheville, which will be hosted by Hunt.
>    ========================================================
>
>Comments:
>
>    Well one thing to notice is Oak Ridge is wanting an SNS project which
uses
>a lot of electricity--------it is a linear accelerators------which are very
>power hogging.   This means the area coal fired power plants--Bull Run and
>Kingston steam plants of TVA will have to burn a lot more coal and emit a lot
>more NOx and SOx and more ozone----------Oak Ridge projects affect the
>Smokies.   Also, Oak Ridge wastes affect the smokies as all the radiation in
>contact with air makes ozone---------tons of it.     Upping the area coal
burn
>will also increase the low dose heavy metals everyone in the area breathes
>which will in turn go to bone and affect immune health.   Uranium and mercury
>and other bone seeking trace metals are released to air via coal burning.
>There are was to filter this out some and protect the public and the rising
>health crisis--------and we need this more than an SNS.
>
>    The environmental impact statements on SNS will likely try to leave off
>the power usage and health considerations and the effects on the smokies that
>are full of dead trees now.    The SNS needs to use a full systems model and
>recognize this is a superfund site and that we don't need to increase power
>usage for the smokies and for the publics health.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
>to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
>select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> 


<<<<=-=-=FREE LEONARD PELTIER=-=-=>>>> 
If you think you are too small to make a difference;
try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito....
African Proverb
<<<<=-=http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/ =-=>>>> 
IF it says:
"PASS THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW...."
Please Check it before you send it at:

http://urbanlegends.miningco.com/library/blhoax.htm

Reply via email to