And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 23:42:23 EST
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 226
>Mailing-List: list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [DOEWatch] Air pollution---particulates, ozone adversely affect
health
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Acute exposure to ambient air pollution confirmed to affect health adversely 
>   
>WESTPORT, Dec 29 (Reuters Health) - Short-term exposure to outdoor air
>pollution can cause adverse health effects, three papers published in the
>January issue of Epidemiology confirm. 
>In the first paper, Dr. Diane Gold, of Brigham and Women's Hospital,
>Boston, Massachusetts, and a multicenter team report that exposure to
>particulate pollution and ozone reduced lung function among schoolchildren
>in Mexico City. 
>
>During three seasons in 1991, Dr. Gold's team conducted twice-daily peak
>expiratory flow testing in 40 children, 8 to 11 years of age. Twenty-one of
>the children had a history of chronic cough, chronic phlegm, wheezing or
>asthma. Along with 224 additional children, the subjects were participating
>in a study of the effects of air pollution on lung function in children
>during exercise. 
>
>Even brief outdoor exposure to particulate matter or ozone within the
>previous 1 to 2 weeks reduced lung function in the exercise study, the
>investigators report. In this substudy, they found that "...only exposures
>of longer duration (6 hours) were associated with measurable [ozone]
>effects on peak flow." 
>
>Separately, Dr. Joel Schwartz, of Harvard School of Public Health, Boston,
>Massachusetts, detected an association between outdoor air pollution and
>hospital admissions for cardiovascular events among the elderly. 
>
>For a 3-year period, Dr. Schwartz compared Medicare records of hospital
>admissions in eight US metropolitan counties with air pollution data
>provided by the Environmental Protection Agency. He found associations
>between hospital admissions and both carbon monoxide and particulate
>matter, with no evidence that the results were confounded by weather,
>sulfur dioxide or ozone. 
>
>"Overall, these results suggest that air pollution may be responsible for
>on the order of 5% of hospital admissions for heart disease," Dr. Schwartz
>estimates. "This is a nontrivial public health burden." 
>
>Dr. Lianne Sheppard and colleagues, of the University of Washington in
>Seattle, determined in the third study that exposure to outdoor air
>pollution is associated with asthma attacks among adults younger than 65
>years of age. 
>
>The study group examined 7,837 nonelderly hospital admissions for asthma
>attacks and 6,437 admissions for appendicitis in Washington State over 8
>years. The researchers also analyzed the levels of all pollutants regularly
>monitored in that region: particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide and
>carbon monoxide. 
>
>The frequency of admissions for asthma attacks was significantly correlated
>with exposure to particulate matter, and a correlation with exposure to

>carbon monoxide was even more pronounced, Dr. Sheppard's group calculated.
>The authors note that these are "...highly intercorrelated copollutants
>that are more realistically considered to be simultaneous rather than
>independent effects." 
>
>In an editorial, Dr. Anthony J. McMichael, of London School of Hygiene and
>Tropical Medicine, and Dr. Kirk R. Smith, of the University of California
>at Berkeley, question whether the studies take "...a sufficiently broad
>approach to the complex, worldwide, public health problem of air pollution." 
>
>"Viewed globally...air pollution epidemiology has often been done on an
>opportunistic basis according to data availability rather than to where the
>major public health problems lie," Drs. McMichael and Smith charge. 
>
>The editorialists suggest that, for example, "...if rural- and
>urban-underclass poverty persists in poor countries, then domestic
>exposures to indoor air pollution [attributable to the use of unprocessed
>solid fuel in household cooking and heating] will remain a major global
>health hazard." 
>
>Epidemiology 1999;10:1-3,8-30. 
>
>==========================================================
>Comments:
>
>        These particulate and ozone effects are easy to see in an area like
>Oak Ridge.   We have had way too much uranium particulates in air and too
much
>ozone as well. Even the last line of the above is important.   Coal fired
>steam plants need lower emission of heavy metals. 
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
>to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
>select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> 

<<<<=-=-=FREE LEONARD PELTIER=-=-=>>>> 
If you think you are too small to make a difference;
try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito....
African Proverb
<<<<=-=http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/ =-=>>>> 
IF it says:
"PASS THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW...."
Please Check it before you send it at:

http://urbanlegends.miningco.com/library/blhoax.htm

Reply via email to