And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
>Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:00:33 -0500
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "John V. Wilmerding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Washington Post Article
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Court Declines Shoplifter's '3 Strikes' Appeal 
>
>By Joan Biskupic Washington Post Staff Writer
>Wednesday, January 20, 1999; Page A6 
>
>Touching on the controversial "three strikes, you're out" laws that
>have swept the nation, the Supreme Court yesterday let California
>impose a 25-year prison sentence on a man who stole a bottle of
>vitamins from a supermarket.
>
>Michael Wayne Riggs was caught taking the pills from a store display
>rack and putting them in his jacket pocket. If this had been his first
>offense, he would have gotten a fine or, under the most harsh
>circumstances, six months in jail. But because Riggs had a record of
>drug crimes, robbery and other felonies, California law required that
>he spend at least 25 years behind bars.
>
>Riggs appealed through state courts, and although the California Court
>of Appeal described his crime as "a petty theft motivated by
>homelessness and hunger," it upheld the stiff sentence. Last year the
>California Supreme Court refused to hear the case, leaving Riggs to
>petition the U.S. Supreme Court for a hearing.
>
>Had he gotten four justices to agree to hear the dispute, Riggs would
>have had another chance to make his case. But yesterday the court
>turned him down. Only one justice, Stephen G. Breyer, said the appeal
>should have been heard, questioning how the state could possibly apply
>such a penalty "to what is in essence a petty offense." In an unusual
>move, three other justices also noted concern that such tough
>mandatory sentences can so disproportionately punish a repeat criminal
>that they violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual
>punishment.
>
>"While this court has traditionally accorded to state legislatures
>considerable (but not unlimited) deference to determine the length of
>sentences for crimes . . . classifiable as felonies," Justice John
>Paul Stevens wrote, "petty theft does not appear to fall into that
>category."
>
>But as much as Stevens, joined in his statement by Justices David H.
>Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, voiced constitutional worries about
>California's three-strikes law, the three justices did not vote to
>take up Riggs's case. Rather than joining Breyer, they said that the
>particulars of Riggs's criminal record were not clear and that they
>would rather wait until lower courts had established a more definitive
>record on California's three-strikes law.
>
>But in declining to accept the case, the three justices also may have
>wondered whether they could have gotten the requisite fifth vote from
>any of the rest of the more conservative justices to build a majority
>opinion against a tough three-strikes law.
>
>In a climate of rigid law enforcement and longer sentences, the
>justices have never taken up the question of whether a three-strikes
>law can be cruel and unusual punishment, particularly when the third

>offense is relatively minor. In past cases, the high court has said
>states may punish a repeat offender more severely than a first-time
>offender, but it also has said a sentence cannot be "grossly
>disproportionate" to the crime.
>
>Over the past decade, more than two dozen states and the federal
>government have enacted laws that require lengthy prison sentences
>after a third felony. California's 1994 law, mandating at least 25
>years for the third offense, is among the toughest in the nation.
>Stevens said the state is the only one that allows a misdemeanor
>offense to qualify for such a severe sentence.
>
>In his roughly typed pauper petition to the Supreme Court, Riggs
>quoted from past court cases and said, "The state, even as it
>punishes, must treat its members with respect for their intrinsic
>worth as human beings. Punishment which is so excessive as to
>transgress those limits and deny that worth cannot be tolerated."
>
>But California officials, urging the justices to reject the case of
>Riggs v. California, asserted that the state court had based its
>ruling on past Supreme Court decisions and its general rule of
>declining to second-guess state sentencing laws. The California
>attorney general's office emphasized Riggs's criminal history:
>convictions for car theft, two counts of possession of a controlled
>substance, two counts of forgery, two counts of receiving stolen
>property, attempted burglary, passing a check with intent to defraud
>and four counts of robbery. 
>
>The state appeals court said Riggs had spent most of the past 15 years
>behind bars and has had a recurring drug problem. When he was arrested
>a syringe was found hidden in his sock.
>
>Separately yesterday, the justices also spurned an effort by Operation
>Rescue to revive a defamation lawsuit against Sen. Edward M. Kennedy
>(D-Mass.), who described the antiabortion group as engaging in
>firebombing and murder. Lower courts had ruled that Kennedy, as an
>employee of the government, is protected from such a lawsuit. 
>
>� Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company 
>
>-- 
>To subscribe to the CERJ E-Mail distribution list, simply send
>an E-mail message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Please include your name
>and your state, province, or country of residence.  Thank you!
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>John Wilmerding, Gen'l Secretary |  E-Mail:    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>=================================|  Web:   http://www.cerj.org  
>*CERJ* International Secretariat |  ICQ Number:       18723495
>---------------------------------+============================
>Campaign     |  217 High Street  |   For        |      A      
>for          |  Brattleboro, VT  |   Justice    |      AR    
>Equity-      |  05301-3018  USA  |   that       |      ART    
>Restorative  |  Telephone & FAX  |   Restores   |     EAR     
>Justice      |  [802]  254-2826  |   Equity     |    HEAR    
>=================================================    HEART    
>Work together to reinvent justice using methods |     EARTH   
>that are fair; which conserve, restore and even |    HEARTH   
>create harmony, equity and good will in society | >>>|CERJ|<<<   

>==============================================================
>We are the prisoners of the prisoners we have taken - J. Clegg
> 
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to