And now:"Save Ward Valley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 I ask - When will they ever learn?  Do these people really care so little
for our lives, the lives of our children, the very life of this Mother
Earth?  This insanity must stop!!!

We, the people, must be the voice of reason.  We, the people, must stop the
desecration and destruction of Mother Earth.  There are three things--very
easy things--each of us can do.

#1  Pray--the power of pray is the power of the people.  It makes no
difference to whom you pray or how; only that you do.

 #2  Educate--share your knowledge with everyone you know.  Print out
important messages like the one below and share it with those that do not
have e-mail.  The more knowledge the people have the stronger they are.

 #3  Make your voice heard--write those letters, make those calls.  Even a
couple of strong statements on a postcard will make a difference.

I thank Creator for each and every one of you out there and for all of  the
work that you do.  May he watch over you and bless you all the days of your
lives.

Molly

January 22, 1999

Bill may change nuke law
Low-level radioactive waste storage in Andrews possible

By Greg Harman
Odessa American

A bill filed last week by state Rep. Pete Gallego, D-Alpine, could pave the
way for low-level radioactive waste to be stored in Andrews County.

Most importantly for Pasadena-based Waste Control Specialists and Utah-based
Envirocare of Texas, House Bill 674 would require the state to contract with
a private company for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste from
Texas, Maine and Vermont.

WCS, which operates a storage and treatment facility for hazardous waste in
Andrews County, and Envirocare of Texas, which recently applied for a
similar permit from the state, both want the right to dispose of low-level
radioactive waste.

State law makes it illegal for private companies to dispose of radioactive
waste in Texas. That responsibility has been assigned to the Texas Low-Level
Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority.

Gallego�s bill would change that.

The bill also proposes to reduce the size, budget and authority of the Texas
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority. It would abolish the "box"
that has required the state�s "compact" waste to be disposed of in Hudspeth
County, opening the rest of Texas as possible sites. And it would allow the
contracted company to hold its own license.

The bill doesn�t require the proposed compact waste site to be placed in
Andrews County, but it could be amended to do so, said WCS executive vice
president Ron Hance.

Hance said he suspects that an amendment will be added to the bill that
would "box," or limit, radioactive waste disposal to Andrews County when the
legislation reaches conference committee later in the session.

"With an amendment, you could put that box in easily," he said.

Rick Jacoby, general manager for the Texas Low-Level Waste Disposal
Authority, warned that an "unintended consequence" of the bill might include
opening the state to a wider variety of radioactive materials from states
other than the three compact states.

"Texas went through a lot of trouble to shut the door (on that waste) by
forming the compact," said Jacoby.

Other wastes that the contracted company could dispose of include waste from
the U.S. Department of Energy, uranium mining and the domestic oil and gas
industry, he said.

The bill also would reduce the staff at the Authority, Jacoby said. The
staff would probably be compensated by an increase of staff at the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission, he said.

John Kyte, an attorney representing WCS, said WCS officials had contributed
to the contents of the bill.

"Representative Gallego was interested in drafting a bill that would allow
the compact to be moved," said Kyte. "We�re happy to see it introduced."

Gallego said HB 674 was not tailored specifically for the waste industry,
but was inspired by "bits and pieces" from various entities, including
environmental interests.

"I�ve allowed anybody who had an interest in this to bend my ear a little,"
he said.

But Gallego�s primary interest was to move the proposed low-level
radioactive waste site away from Hudspeth County � and out of his district,
he said.

Andrews County is welcome to the compact site if it wants it, he said.

"I don�t have a problem with Andrews County. If you have a willing buyer and
a willing seller, it�s a deal," he said.

Hudspeth County is a willing seller and Andrews County may be that willing
buyer, he said.

"We�ve spent about $50 million as a state and we don�t have anything to show
for it," so it is time to "let private enterprise have a chance at it,"
Gallego said.

WCS sought and failed to overturn the state restriction on private companies
in 1995, but was rejected by the Texas Legislature.

After pressing its argument in the U.S. District courts, WCS� case finally
was rejected by a federal appeals court in May of 1998. A favorable ruling
would have allowed the company to bid on DOE waste.

Dan Morales, then the attorney general, termed the suit an attempt to
"dictate waste management policy" and "evade Texas law."

Kyte said Morales� arguments were rejected by the court.

"WCS has never sought to avoid state law or state regulation," he said.

The WCS lawsuit is awaiting trial in Federal District Court in Wichita
Falls, Kyte said.



Save Ward Valley
107 F Street
Needles, CA  92363
ph. 760/326-6267
fax 760/326-6268

http://www.shundahai.org/SWVAction.html
http://earthrunner.com/savewardvalley
http://www.ctaz.com/~swv1
http://banwaste.envirolink.org
http://www.alphacdc.com/ien/wardvly4.html
http://www.greenaction.org

Reply via email to