And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source:
<A HREF="http://www.spokane.net/news-story-
body.asp?Date=012699ID=s520741&cat=+
body.asp?Date=012699&ID=s520741&cat=+">http://www.spokane.net/news-story-
body.asp?Date=012699&ID=s520741&cat=</A>
========================================================
Thyroid study to go on Internet
Long-awaited Hanford report expected to be released Thursday

Karen Dorn Steele - The Spokesman-Review

A long-awaited study of thyroid disease among Hanford downwinders will be made
public Thursday by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The federal study was launched a decade ago, after the government's belated
admission that radiation releases from Hanford during the early years of the
Cold War were massive and dangerous.



The Hanford Thyroid Disease Study is the first ever to locate and examine
people living in the path of radiation emissions from a U.S. weapons
production site. The only other civilians to have been tracked and studied are
Japanese A-bomb survivors, residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to H-bomb
tests, and Utah schoolchildren showered with fallout from nuclear bomb tests
in Nevada.

The new study has enormous implications for future Hanford studies, for the
downwinder litigation wending its way through the federal courts, and for the
government's credibility in the aftermath of the nuclear arms race.

The CDC has clamped a tight lid on its findings until Thursday's 3 p.m.
release at a news conference in Richland. The agency will brief members of
Congress on Wednesday, said a spokesman for Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.

``CDC is treating this like a national secret,'' said scientist Owen Hoffman,
a health studies consultant who recently finished a health risk assessment for
the state of Tennessee on radiation releases from a weapons plant at Oak
Ridge.

``This is highly unusual. They've either found something way beyond what they
expected, or they haven't found anything,'' Hoffman said of the Hanford study.

``They are controlling this as tightly as they can,'' said Lynne Stembridge of
Spokane, executive director of the Hanford Education Action League (HEAL) and
chairwoman of a federal advisory committee on nuclear-related health studies.

Officials at other federal agencies, including the Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry in Atlanta and the U.S. Department of Energy in
Washington, D.C., are also saying little.

``There is a blackout on discussing the CDC study,'' said ATSDR spokesman Greg
Thomas.

His agency has been trying unsuccessfully to get $12.9 million from DOE to
launch a new program to track the health of 14,000 people exposed as children
to Hanford's radiation releases. But DOE has refused so far to pay for it.

DOE and ATSDR officials discussed the CDC study and its implications for the
Hanford medical monitoring project at a meeting last week in Washington, D.C.,
said Dr. James Smith of CDC's radiation studies branch.

But Smith said he can't talk yet.

The Hanford thyroid study's implications for the ATSDR work will be discussed
in Richland on Thursday, said Paul Seligman, a DOE undersecretary for
environment, safety and health.




The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle conducted the study for
CDC and announced plans last year to release it in March after publishing the
results in a scientific journal.

But the CDC, in response to public pressure last fall from members of several
federal advisory committees, decided to move up the release date.

``We felt the study was taking an absurd amount of time, and their first
priority was to release this information to the public,'' said Judith Jurji of
Seattle, a Hanford downwinder on the CDC study's advisory committee.

The National Academy of Sciences also told the CDC it wouldn't review the
Hanford study until it had been made public.

Attorneys for a group of Hanford downwinders have subpoenaed the study and
urged its quick release to meet discovery deadlines imposed by U.S. District
Judge Alan McDonald in the Hanford downwinders litigation.

``It's going to have major ramifications,'' said attorney Bryan Coluccio of
Seattle.

Congress authorized the study in 1988, following revelations that Hanford's
Cold War releases of radioactive Iodine-131 were large enough to pose health
risks.

The CDC contracted with the Fred Hutchinson center in 1989. The researchers
conducted a pilot study from 1990 to 1994, followed by an expanded study.

The study was designed to see if there's a connection between Hanford's
radiation releases and a variety of thyroid diseases, including cancer,
hypothyroidism, benign thyroid nodules and abnormalities in the adjacent
parathyroid glands.

People selected for the expanded study were identified from birth records in
the counties near Hanford. Those chosen were born from 1940 to 1946 and were
infants or small children during Hanford's peak emission years, 1945-1952.
========================================================

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOEWatch List  ---  Subscribe online:
http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/doewatch
Quote from Truman's diary July 25, 1945:  "We have discovered the most
terrible bomb in the history of the world.  It may be the fire destruction
prophesized in the Euphrates Valley Era, after Noah and his fabulous Ark.
Anyway we think we have found the way to cause the disintegration of the
atom."

"The Doctor of the future will give No Medicine, but will interest his
patients in the care of the human frame, in diet, and in the cause and
prevention of disease."
-Attributed to Thomas Alva Edison



           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to