And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Activist Mailing List - http://get.to/activist

http://unisci.com/stories/19992/0430992.htm

                              University Science

                Pesticide Use, Cancer Incidence Both Increasing

  While Americans annually spend more money on chemically treating their
  lawns, the incidence of certain types of cancers related to pesticide
  exposure also increases. At the same time, by treating lawns and gardens
  with pesticides, they are ensuring that next year's bugs will be even harder
  to eliminate than this year's, a recipe for ecological disaster, according
  to Thomas S. Mang, Ph.D., clinical and research associate professor of oral
  and maxillofacial surgery in the University at Buffalo School of Dental
  Medicine.

  Mang, a former member of the City of Buffalo Pesticide Management Board and
  Town of Amherst Pesticide Advisory Board, says Americans spend more money
  each year on chemically-treated lawns, in spite of new information and
  studies on their health effects published in prestigious peer-reviewed
  journals. The studies have found repeatedly that pesticides, including
  herbicides and fungicides, are related to increases in certain types of
  cancers.

  "Each year, there is a 5-8 per cent increase in the use of lawn-care
  chemicals," says Mang, "and a 3-4 per cent increase in non-Hodgkin's
  lymphoma."

  While no direct correlation has been proven between those increases, he
  notes that non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a type of cancer that debilitates the
  immune system, has in many studies been linked to pesticide exposure. It
  also is one of a handful of cancers that are on the rise.

  For example, Mang says, individuals such as farmers who handle pesticides in
  their jobs are four times as likely to develop non-Hodgkin's lymphoma than
  are other people. He cites a recent study noting that in people who are
  exposed to pesticides for more than 20 days per year, there is a three- to
  seven-fold increase in the incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

  Other studies have shown that in children, exposure to pesticides
  significantly increases their risk of developing leukemia. Even pets are
  vulnerable, says Mang, with dogs that have been exposed to pesticides
  demonstrating the same types of increases in these cancers.

  Mang stresses that pesticides persist in the atmosphere, often for months at
  a time. A recent EPA study, he adds, found 23 kinds of pesticides in dust
  inside homes.

  But it is not just current exposures to pesticides that are the problem,
  according to Mang. Future generations are being affected, too, through birth
  defects linked to pesticide exposure and through infertility problems found
  in animals and now being seen in humans.

  "A lot of pesticides are estrogen mimics and they persist in the
  environment," he says. "These pesticides can have severe effects, and have
  been linked to increases in breast and testicular cancer, as well as to an
  increase in some very rare birth defects and in severe drops in sperm counts
  in human males.""

  The public, he believes, is mistakenly taking comfort in labels that say
  products are registered with the EPA.

  "The Environmental Protection Agency is not a consumer protection agency,"
  he says. "It is a registration agency. All the EPA asks of a pesticide
  manufacturer, is 'Does it work against the target organism?' If the answer
  is 'yes,' that's good enough (for it to be registered)."

  In fact, he says, it now is against the law in New York State for any
  pesticide manufacturer or applicator to say that pesticides are safe, even
  when used in a proper manner.

  "We do not know enough about these substances," says Mang. "We don't know
  about their metabolic fate, because it's not part of the testing procedure.
  We don't know how they interact with each other or with some medication that
  you may be taking."

  But probably the most important reason not to use pesticides, he notes, is
  that, ultimately, they cause pests to do more -- not less -- damage to
  lawns, plants and crops.

  "We're creating a drug-dependent environment," he says. "We are killing the
  easy pests and selecting out for the tougher ones."

  Instead, says Mang, consumers should try non-chemical ways of controlling
  pests, such as integrated pest management (IPM), which advocates
  non-chemical and least-toxic solutions. They include mechanical controls,
  physical barriers (such as caulking to keep pests from coming indoors) and
  chemical controls, such as fly strips, that contain sex hormones that
  attract insects. - By Ellen Goldbaum

  [CONTACT: ELLEN GOLDBAUM ]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  30-Apr-1999

Reprinted under the fair use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
doctrine of international copyright law.
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to