And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

From: Mary Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Lubicon Information Meeting

** Please circulate widely. **

Lubicon Crees: A settlement at last?

Information Evening on 15 September, 6 pm at Lamoureux Hall, room
221, Ottawa University

Friends of the Lubicon and Amitie Lubicons-Quebec coalition members will
take those attending through the rocky past decades of Lubicon history,
including the ultimately successful boycott of multinational forestry
company Daishowa, up to the present day where the tiny First Nation seems
breathlessly close to a settlement with the federal government. Join us to
find out just how close - and how precarious - an agreement is.

More information: tel 777 3058 


31 August 1999
Peace River Record-Gazette

Government move underhanded, say Lubicon

By DEB GUERETTE
RECORD-GAZETTE STAFF

The provincial government's call for proposals for timber allocation in
disputed Lubicon Lake Indian Nation traditional territory is underhanded,
Lubicon leadership has told premier Ralph Klein.

Mike Cardinal, associate minister of forestry, officially issued a request
for proposals for timber in three north central forest management units,
Aug. 3.

Rights to the S10 FMU were released by Daishowa-Marubeni International when
it canceled its plant expansion plans. After a multi-year boycott effort
that cost Ontario based paper producer Daishowa Inc. some $20 million in
lost sales, DMI this spring publicly committed to not log in or purchase
timber from the S10 area that surrounds the first nation's proposed reserve
lands on three sides, until Lubicon land rights were settled.

Putting the "timber rights in unceeded Lubicon territory" up for industry
grabs again is "part of a transparent provincial government strategy to put
other First Nations in the front lines of provincial government efforts to
undermine and subvert Lubicon rights," Lubicon chief Bernard Ominayak told
premier Klein in an Aug. 25 letter.

"Using supposed economic benefits as bait to play poor aboriginal people
off against each other and steal valuable aboriginal lands and resources is
a classic colonial divide and conquer tactic which will be recognized and
condemned as such by people around the world," Ominayak wrote.

Recent provincial government involvement in Lubicon settlement negotiations
is also undermined by the timber allocation plans, Ominayak says.

"Only one week after Alberta's negotiator John McCarthy met with us to
restart negotiations between our governments, your government announced
that Alberta is now seeking bids for that same timber. Selling off the
resources which are the subject of talks even as you sit at the negotiating
table does not indicate any serious desire on your government's part to
resolve these issues. (This) approach to dealing with Lubicon rights
prolongs continuing uncertainty to the determent of not only the Lubicon
people but to the detriment of all people with interests in the area who
need a settlement of Lubicon rights to proceed with their lives in an
orderly, predictable way," Ominayak wrote.

Peace River MLA Gary Friedel says the "traditional territory" the Lubicon
claim is Crown land that "has never been recognized as theirs by anyone but
themselves."

The area was part of an industry forest management area and the 185,000
cubic meters of timber available for harvest annually in S10 will be again
after proposals are reviewed and it is reallocated.

Lubicon settlement negotiations "are ongoing" and the amount of land
negotiated will be provided by the province, Friedel said.

"I don't think it is appropriate to sterilize the whole area," while
negotiations continue, Friedel said.

Aboriginal involvement in the new proposals for that area will be
important, he adds.

"It would be most difficult to consider any proposal that did not
significantly consider involvement by aboriginal communities," he said,
adding, "any company that submits (bids for S10 timber) would have to
assume the responsibility of working with all the native communities around
there." The need for development in the area makes it hard for government
to hold back on doing business until the Lubicon claim is settled, he said.

"You can't put the business of government on hold... (and) have everything
in limbo until this issue is settled. There appears to be light at the end
of the tunnel (for the Lubicon settlement), but it has been there before,
too," he said.

Ominayak tells Klein that "we trust you will advise anyone wishing to log
in those areas that our respective rights in traditional Lubicon territory
are subject to negotiation and that rights to the resources in those areas
are therefore not currently for sale."

Friends of the Lubicon, the group that organized the Daishowa boycott, is
advising its network of supporters of the recent developments. Lubicon
leadership first asked the federal government to negotiate land rights in
the 1930's.

After many failed rounds of settlement discussions, a new chief federal
negotiator was appointed in spring 1998 and talks, called productive by
both sides, have been ongoing since.

Chief provincial negotiator John McCarthy met with the negotiating parties
for the first time July 29.

Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine 
of international copyright law.
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
           Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                      Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                   http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
            UPDATES: CAMP JUSTICE             
http://shell.webbernet.net/~ishgooda/oglala/
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                              

Reply via email to